PACMAN: Mayweather is good but not that good!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by r2d2, Aug 26, 2009.


  1. Silver

    Silver The Champ is Here Full Member

    5,363
    369
    Jul 16, 2005
    maybe, but the same can be said for pacquiao
     
  2. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    yup. mayweather is so good just as RJJ was.

    RJJ was undefeated, virtually unstoppable at his peak. he retired or played basketball on the side. came back and finally father time will catch up with him. just like any other fighter.

    PBF retired when he was at the top of his game with top fighters in line. That is the difference between the two. RJJ took on all comers, even a lightheavyweight in ruiz. but pbf came back against a fighter 2 weights lower than him.

    just imagine how big it would have been if he went up against mosley or cotto. Instead, he went up against baldo, gatti, hatton and dlh.

    not exactly a great resume for a fighter of his size and skills. pbf is not invincible.
     
  3. tysonlewisbook

    tysonlewisbook Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,632
    0
    Sep 18, 2008
    fraud has shown us his kryptonite - it's Cotto, Margarito, Mosley and now Pacquiao. even when fraud just talks about them you can hear how weak phony and hypocritical he sounds.
     
  4. riannu25

    riannu25 Active Member Full Member

    641
    0
    Jun 29, 2008
    Just answer one question: After the Forbes fight what weight does DLH seeks to fight? What was the supposed weight to be rematch with FMJ that did not pushed thru?
     
  5. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    626
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    you must be nallege's pedo-sex slave. wtf does facing african-american fighters have to do with anything? the best fighters in the divisions he's been in were NOT african american. it's like wanting to be the best heavyweight now and choosing to face hasim rahman and not wladimir klitschko. just plain moronic.

    as far as guzman, soto, j.diaz goes. pac had this choice:
    "hmm...i'll beat soto, guzman, valero and i'll have insignificant but "true" boxing fans on the internet sucking my balls...OR, i can beat mab, morales, jmm, hatton and i'll have a passport to the HOF, make 10s of millions of dollars, become the future president of my country, and have beautiful women servicing my balls day and night... ****, I JUST CAN'T DECIDE!!":patsch
     
  6. swilson120

    swilson120 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,009
    0
    May 6, 2009
    fight wont happen cotto gonna win
     
  7. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006

    Posters who say tha Hoya was weight drained simply does not know what that means. How can Hoya be weight drained when 2 months prior to the fight, he was hovering at or near 147 already. There is no possibility to be weight-drained because weight-drain is a term when boxers cut weight by losing water, and if that ws the case, then Hoya is sehydrated for 2 months, which is an absolute medical nightmare.

    However, being said, Hoya probably lost weight by cutting muswcle mass, which, even when he is not boxing, he would probably do because he is a metrosexual poster boy. Afterall, you probably would not look good in a fishnet with lSwarzenegger muscles.

    Obviously from a trainers perspective, they want oscar to be faster and to do that, weioght exercises involve fast, repition involving light weights. However, because it is not a bulking up process, he would lose weight but gain speed (which even in his prime wa not exceptionally speedy _handspeed was good but footspeed was terribly slow).

    To say Hoya was drained is simply stupid, ignoramus and ill-informed.
     
  8. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Who is this goose? And why is he calling Pacquiao a **** when Pacquiao is a class act compared to the boorish and ignorant Mayweather?
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    thats the hype. Undefeated, best compubox ratio (LOL), 6 belts in 5 divisions, never knocked down except by Judah...

    thats the hype.

    Beat Erik Morales twice, Marco Antonio Barrera twice, and Juan Manuel Marquez. KTFO Hatton in 2 rounds. Put on a masterclass against Oscar. Is fighting COTTO in his next fight when he was still a super featherweight in early 2008

    thats whats real.



    Like I said, Floyd is a great fighter. If you look at whats real, its still impressive. Destroyed Corrales, beat Castillo, knocked out Hatton, beat Oscar. Thats very good and alot better than most other resumes out there.
     
  10. money21207

    money21207 knockout artist Full Member

    495
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    its absolutely to suggest that floyds all smoke and mirrors floyd is a technically sound fighter great counter puncher he's quick and has great defense you guys well some of u kill me with this garbage floyd is simply a far better boxer than pac not even close pac is great but u guys are just not being sensible now pacs the greatest and floyd is smoke n mirrors a lot of u guys are so blind to facts and just delusional fanboys that u ignore obvious things floyd and pac are great talents floyd is more polished n technically sound no smoke n mirrors here pal try again
     
  11. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    pac is good at fighting, not with trashtalking.
     
  12. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Judah did not knock down Mayweather. He stepped on his foot, which caused himself to be off balance with which Judah caught him a with a punch, even then his glove only touched the ground. He hasnt been KTFO twice like your hero and knocked down by a jab by a guy named Skinny Huisein. :lol::lol::lol:
    Zahir Raheem beat Morales before Pac did. Junior Jones beat Barrera twice before Pac got to him. Just like Hatton and DLH, Pac is good at beating other peoples leftovers.

    Not to mention the years of wear and tear that both Morales and Barrera had. The fact that Pac was able to lose to Morales a faded one at that, says alot about his skill level at the time. Mayweather beat the 2 best lightweights in the primes of their career, they both went on to have great careers. MOrales and Barrera were largely done after the Pac fights.
    Lost 18-24 rounds against him on 2 judges scorecards. Mayweather has lost 1 scorecard in his entire career. He got outboxed by an older, weaker fighter who put on a masterclass against him in the 2nd half of both fights.
    I see very little seperating their resumes. I rate Pac slightly higher because he came from lower weights to do it. However Mayweather has had a far easier career, because he is the better boxer and athlete.
     
  13. money21207

    money21207 knockout artist Full Member

    495
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    who is invincible?
     
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    all these excuses you're pulling out, I can throw the same **** right back at you with a different spin.
     
  15. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    1
    Aug 14, 2009
    Mayweather may not be "that good", but he sure as hell is good enough to beat manny.