Pacquiao said that what the Mayweather's are doing is bad for boxing and that everyone is starting to believe it and he is being asked by many if he is in fact juicing..." it is bad for boxing they are not doing any good for boxing " Well, Pacquiao can do something good for boxing...he can bite the bullet and capitulate by taking the tests. Which will expose the Mayweather's as irresponsible trash talkers and he would do a load of good for boxing. If he in fact comes out clean !!!!
If it looks like a duck & quacks like a duck...... this is really too bad,I think potentialy the best fight in a very long time sabotaged by scam,roach say`s his fighter is clean,but will not subject him to blood test(because he is afraid of needles?). Paquiao wanted 8 oz gloves,got it,50 50 purse got it,mayweather`s camp wants olympic type testing likely due to Paquiao`s unusual increase in KO power as he has moved up in weight, NO. WHY???? Duran,Hearns,Armstrong,Arguello,Leonard,& many more moved up in weight and NONE of them increased their KO power as they did. This does not mean Manny is guilty,but if he is not willing to take the olympic style ,random, type testing then a duck is a duck...
Hasn't said that at all. It's not suprising that your conclusions are wrong when you start off with made up 'facts'.
i think all boxers should be subjected to a "more reliable" blood test instead of urine test. i mean lets think about it, they are there to pound each other to a bloody pulp. they put their very lives and lively hoods at stake when they get into that ring. and to find out that the guy who killed or crippled them for life was dirty would be devastating for their families and for boxing. so, here i am declaring that the boxing sanctioning bodies should seriously consider replacing the urine test w/ a more full proof test, which is the blood test.
idiot. so every test done in the histoy of boxing was not valid because it was not done by the mayweather commission?
So how does an innocent person who doesn't want to take the unwarranted and unprecedented tests act in this situation then?
Doesn't that mean that regardless of strict testing, modern doping tech makes it harder for cheating athletes to be caught?
Clearly he submits to the whims of the crackhead father of his potential opponent, even at the cost of his own performance. Any innocent person would find these demands reasonable.
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/trackandfield/news/story?id=2554220 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/18/AR2006081800926.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2006/aug/19/athletics.drugsinsport She tested positive for EPO in 2006 dude. She had to confess, she was busted. The testing DOES work.