Pacman vs Hagler

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by creationstory, Oct 30, 2011.


  1. Money7

    Money7 The Best Full Member

    1,440
    2
    Oct 6, 2004
    quit feeding the trolls
     
  2. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011

    It's like none of these people have never heard of Marvin Hagler. Hagler KO's Pacquiao in a late round stoppage....TOMORROW!
     
  3. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,079
    3,670
    Jun 30, 2005
    I know this thread is a joke to begin with, and this is totally irrelevant, but anyway, I don't really agree with Hagler walking through Hearns's best shots. Hearns landed some good shots, even stunning him with the short right uppercut and then a looping right hand after that.

    Hearns's best shot was when he got distance, and full leverage on that right hand. Hagler closed the gap on Hearns and didn't allow Tommy to get the distnace he preferred for that right hand. Hearns landed some nice looping right hands around Hagler's guard, but not the devastating straight right he landed on Cuevas, Shuler, Duran, etc...

    I think Hagler would've taken Hearns's best shots well though.
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,079
    3,670
    Jun 30, 2005
    Hagler usually was pretty patient, boxing in the middle of the ring, and then turning it up later on. Or he could hurt his opponent in his usual boxing mode, and then pounce on him once this happened.

    But his usual style was to box in the middle of the ring, using economic lateral movement, picking his shots well, it wasn't to pressure his opponent.

    Now that I think about it, if they were the same size, Hagler's usual boxing style would probably be the better way for him to fight Pacquiao. As said in an earlier post, Hagler's jab and movement can disrupt the rhythm that Pacquiao likes to get into.
     
  5. boxinger

    boxinger Guest

    Hagler is too slow for pac,
     
  6. Goro

    Goro Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,523
    0
    Feb 18, 2011
    Pacman is one of the great fighters p4p all time, but to take on Hagler arguably the best at 160 when Pacquiao started his career weighing 106lbs is asking too much.

    He hasn't even fought at a full 154 let alone 160. Hagler is a career 160lber, Hagler would have the advantage clearly.

    This is an obvious troll thread filled with *****s refreshing their browsers looking to flame people that picked Pacquiao.
     
  7. Box Box Box

    Box Box Box Active Member Full Member

    764
    1
    May 1, 2010
    they're not on the same size. pac can't make 154 let alone 160 and hagler won't go down 147. who voted hagler by tko/ko is obviously looking at pac hagler at 160.
     
  8. jeromejones

    jeromejones Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,534
    0
    Feb 27, 2010

    Ill go on for you

    Audley Harrison>danny williams> mike tyson> trevor berbick> Ali

    therefore

    Audley Harrison>Ali :good