Pacman was very ordinary earlier in his career...hmmm!

Stupid twat

 

If you knew what you were talking about you would know the thread starter said that Pacquiao was very ordinary earlier in his career which means he must be better than ordinary now. Has nothing to do with cherry picks.

When you look at how these fighters were viewed at the same spot earlier in their careers, they were looked at as ordinary. FACT

 

Pac is a STEROID PUMPING CYBORG!

 

Yes it does dickhead. His resume is full of cherry picks, weight drained fighters and catch weights

OPEN YOUR MIND UP FOR 2 SECONDS YOU STUPID *******

Hopkins, Hagler were ordinary when they first started!!!???

get lost, don't bother talking boxing you're so dumb it's pathetic

 

Probably......

 

Yes, I did win. :smoke

 

All *******s think they win when they don't.

Enjoy the Marquez fight

"Pac was always better than Marquez, everyone who says pac lost twice to him, well this fight proves that Pac was always better"

atsch

144!!!!????

Who beat him previously??? Oh yeah - the best fighter of our generation FMJ

Who will Manny fight next?

Well it won't be Floyd because I won't allow a test tube of blood to be taken

I know, lets try ORITZ BECAUSE MANNY PICKS OFF FLOYDS LEFTOVERS

BOOM :smoke:smoke:smoke:smoke:smoke:smoke

 

So what your saying is that a fighter going 40+ and 0 and then getting Waxed had no affect on his next several fights?? It didnt effect his cofidence at all. Hatton's fight with Collazo was tough because Collazo is a good fighter and is actaully a jr middle which made it tough for Hatton to impose his style on.

Post like this and threads like these are the reason that many long time posters dont come in here anymore. When you make a post instead of debating you get.. "OH yeah well So and So did it too" Or they try to defend a fighter by bringing up a fighter that has nothing to do with the topic.

Truth is this is a valid thread. Pac was very much an average fighter, then he tight cast his foes. Fighting the same kind of fighter over and over again has made him a superstar. Move up fight a slow fighter with no defence, move up fight a slower fighter with less defence. Couple that with the fact that Manny is no longer cutting too much weight which is the reason that he seems to have gotten stronger, you get a perfect strom of an over rated fighter. Manny is a great fighter, top 3 all times like many are trying to say??? Not even close. Im going to need to see Manny fight and beat some fighters in thier primes with some hand speed.

 

What this fight proves is where each man is today in their respective careers. When PAC vs JMM first happened it was a physically PRIME JMM with championship experience against a one demensional PHENOM in Manny.

The rematch had PAC shed his raw, one demensional approach and actually become a well rounded fighter with ALL the exceptional phsyical attributes he used to upset far more technically sound fighters.

JMM was more prepared for PAC and JMM was at his overall best! He was at his best weight, he had more championship level experience and he was peaking. PAC was still getting better.

This 3rd fight is between a OVERALL PHYSICALLY PRIME and best PAC... 2 weight classes above JMM's ideal weight and 3 to 4 yrs past his overall best as a fighter.

The outcome will be exactly what you'd expect if you were looking at this on paper. Sometimes boxing throws you a curve ball and the upset happens but the majority of the time the outcome is clear.

 

Did you honestly think they would turn out the way they did two years into their career? And you sound like a real toughguy behind the computer screen on the keyboards. I'm shivering and think I should get lost. :nono

 

Fact:
You are a ****ing moron.

Fact:
You are a butt hurt Pac hater who's one of the people who predicted that Pac will lose to Hatton because Hatton is the bigger man. You **** your pants and cried like the little girl you are when Pac sent him to canvass unconscious.

Of course you wont admit that.

Boxer of the Decade. Live with it.

 

You have no validity to your claim that Hatton was still suffering the after-effects of the Mayweather fight because of his performance vs Paulie Malignaggi immediately before he fought Pac.

A prime Miguel Cotto at 140 could not stop Malignaggi, despite breaking Paulie's jaw. And Cotto was a monster at 140.

Hatton dominated him, won every round, punished him and stopped him.

Malignaggi was the consensus number 2 in the division at the time.

It was Hatton's best win and most convincing performance, after Tszyu.


Many people were saying after this fight that Floyd Sr had made Hatton a better fighter, a more complete fighter.

Then Pacquiao thrashes him at his natural, peak, best fighting weight, and all of a sudden Hatton was a shell of a human being because of a loss that happened 18 months earlier, since which he had turned in a storming performance in a big fight.

Pathetic, childish, fanboy garbage. :deal


Hatton was never a welterweight, he was not comfortable there, he was not natural there, he was undersized there, and he, and me, and every neutral, and everyone on planet Earth with a brain, knows he was a much more potent force at 140. :good

 

How many catchweights has Pac fought you ****ing idiot?

 

Fact: Pacquiao has went 1-0-1 vs Marquez

Fact: Pac is the p4p#1 and was the official Fighter Of The Decade for the 2000s

Fact: You are a degenerate snivelling cokehead troll

:good

 

STOP. Don't say that. Hatton was supposed to be a broken fighter after the Floyd fight. Let's pretend that Hatton never won again after that fight. Let's pretend that Ricky lost the urge to fight and retired and became an addict after the Floyd fight because he was "broken" by Floyd.

Hitfag-fan and other idiots see it that way.