Pacman would never beat prime Morales

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JM22, Jul 2, 2008.


  1. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    135? You have to be kidding me. What exactly has Morales done at 135 to warrant him above Pac? Get your head out of your ass.

    122, 126, 130 Prime Morales > 122, 126, 130 Prime Pac
    135 Morales < 135 Pac
    Current Pac > Pac on EM trilogy

    And to say that Prime for Prime Morales destroys Pac is ridiculous considering Pac's not out of his prime yet and is only getting better.
     
  2. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest


    And so is the freedom to forego any sense of objectivity:hi:
     
  3. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    You fail, that wasnt even a prime Pac that obliterated Mab.
     
  4. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    Yeah! if in REALITY the score is 2 wins against one. Some fans would go to DREAMLAND and declare the prime x will beat boxer y at the ffw weights....

    Would have, could have...situation..

    Have you even noticed that pac fans does not normally or don't usually use the reasoning of prime pac beats x boxer at 122,126.... etc

    Fans does not have to say.. would have, could have... coz he DID!:good
     
  5. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    If you can provide any proof of me alluding to that, I'll be more than happy to retract my "you're a dumbass" comment":hi:
     
  6. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    There is a difference between opinion and fact.
    Opinion which was stated here can not be proven right or wrong simply
    because it's an opinion. However, the way it's written by the author
    seems to imply it's already a fact.

    He stated an opinion. I just stated a fact:hi:
     
  7. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    Here we go again.. :patsch

    You can talk all this crap, trying to discredit Pac or say that it's logic, but it's only an opinion.. Morales was a great fighter, but when Pacquiao first fought him, he was no where near as skilled as he is today, not to mention he went all 12 rounds with a bad cut..

    Another thing, Pacquiao wasn't even in his prime..
     
  8. Shev

    Shev Active Member Full Member

    508
    0
    Jun 9, 2007
    One of the greatest films ever, very few people know of it.
     
  9. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest


    PAC vs Morales1 = UD.......... that's a fact

    "PAC vs Morales1 = UD moreles" ...is fact with bias towards PAC


    Don't worry, I don't expect you to get it:rasta
     
  10. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    alright now we know where allblack;s dumbass has been
     
  11. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    agree
     
  12. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    Stop being so paranoid, not every poster that owns you is "allblack":deal
     
  13. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    in jin chi

    discuss
     
  14. Uppercut83

    Uppercut83 The Quitschkos are bums Full Member

    4,209
    1
    Jun 28, 2008
    Pac definetly wasn't in his prime when the first Morales fight happend so this statement is pure bs.
     
  15. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Wrong. Prime Pacquiao beats prime Morales more often than not. Just cause Morales won the first fight by 2 points people think its cast in stone that prime Morales beats Pac every time. Alot of people say that Morales was shot, but forget to mention that it was Pacquiao's first fight at 130 and that he got a nasty cut from a headbutt early in the fight, which was pouring blood into his eye the whole time.