Pacman would never beat prime Morales

yeah, i agree. i guess fighting 9 mexicans in a row does bring out the hate. bring on hatton or campbell!

 

somehow i just hate this stupid emote --> :hi:

 

Move on with your life!

pac beat mab 2x, morales 2x. morales won over pac 1x only!


bottom lin pac is > than mab and morales..
morales has retired. mad has retired. pac is NOW #1p4p

now... if you would like to live in the would have... could have...
be my guest! it's an opinion and the fight never occured so I'll
make you happy...

prime morales beats pac at 122,126,130, 135..EVEN 140 if you like!:good

what round would you prefer?! all round 1 by KO

HAPPY NOW?!:hey

Let me get this staight.
a) above mentioned scenario NEVER happened
b) you and I are not wrong to think this way coz it's an opinion
c) it's far from fact coz what was mentioned was is a product of
imagination - DREAMLAND, would have, could have..

REALITY - no if's not but's, no would have, no could have..
DREAMLAND - would have, could have, prime morales beats pac on
all weight caterogy (opinion)

There you go! Where do you prefer to stay?
DREAMLAND or REALITY!

You have the freedom of choice!

 

He takes out Soto, its game over. I expect to give Pac a goodbye fight to Israel Vasquez if Roach lets him.

 

Of the three fights, Morales was closest to his best in the first. A fight Morales won. Make of that what you will. Ans yes, you Pac fans can say that's convenient. But that doesn't make it any less true.

 

If Izzy wins...

I'll start a thread here entitled "Izzy would never beat prime Pacquiao"

:hi:

 

these guys are friends hope not

 

Vasquez deserves a big payday after that trilogy. I see it as Pacman's way of passing of the torch.

If I were Vasquez, I'd ask for a catchweight at 132 for this fight. Wish Pac could make weight at 126 but it ain't gonna happen.

Did Vasquez fight Marquez at 122 or 126..I don't remember.

 

Yes he won them. Just like Berbick won over Ali, or Joppy over Duran. Tszyu over Chavez. Norris over Leonard. All legit wins withi no excuses. In all those fights, the better fighter won. That just doesn't mean they beat the best version of that fighter. And that's not an excuse either. It's a fact. No one will ever say those guys I listed who lost were at their best.

 

So do you also agree that the Pacquiao who lost in the first Pac-EM fight was not at his best? Let's see your objectivity.

 

Can you tell me why you think he wasn't at his best? For me, it's not as easy to tell. I generally see a fighter being in his best over a period of time. Not on a fight to fight basis. Pac's been at a high level for years. Can you say what fight was Pac at his best?

 

130 :good

 

THat's only if Pac WAS washed up when/if they fought. If Pac looked washed up before Kahn, then you could say Kahn beat a washed up Pac. If Pac looks great right up tp the fight, then no, Kahn might not have beat a prime Pac, but he'd have beaten still top Pac.

 

This content is protected

:nut

 

I will let you answer that question. Disregarding the weight, which Pac version will win the Pac vs. Pac fight, the Pac in Pac-EM 1 or the Pac in Pac-Diaz fight?