This content is protected I can not see how anybody gave Pacquiao the first round and the 4th you can score for bradley and the 7th you can also score that for bradley. My card on fight night Bradley Pac 1) 10 9 2) 10 9 3) 10 9 4) 9 10 5) 9 10 6) 9 10 7) 10 9 8) 9 10 9) 9 10 10) 10 9 11) 10 9 12) 10 9 115-113 Bradley that was watching it live, Watching it again the fourth rounds looks to be a toss up round either guy could have won that.
And this is what leads me to question the Compubox stats, for example Round 7 HBO threw a stat chart up with about 30 seconds left in that round stating Pacquiao landed 27 shots in that round to Bradleys 9 Watch that round and show me wehre Manny threw 27 shots, much less landed them. I do not see it.
**** no it wasnt worse than that and I am a Die Hard Holyfield fan, Evander was dominated from pillar to ****ing post in that fight. This fight was far from that it was close
had it 116-112 pac, if I would be very, and I mean very generous it could be 115-113 pac... less than that is only possible when money talks ....
I had it 116-113. People giving Bradley 1 or two rounds are on board the Pac train, or wait until the comentators tell them who they think won the round and go with that. I by no means think Bradley won, but it was closer than some are saying. Still a robbery though as the round Pac won he won clearly.