Pacquaio has overrated footwork

Pack has ATROCIOUS footwork. He makes up for it with hand speed, power, and fighting spirit. All men can't be all things.

Just like Mayweather isn't a "pressure fighter". Ha.

 

Whats my point? youre a moron. lateral movement isnt the same thing as going backwards. comprende? he doesnt do that well.

 

Bacause Pacd is a Genius!! He forsee everything. Even the floyd ducking, He predicted it could happen. Pac moving up to welter and Beat DLH, Hatton, Cotto & maybe cheato. He mentioned it all & he told us how it will played out!!

He also mentioned Pac's movement & Footwork will be one of the key to be successful at these higher weight classes. All u have to do is type pacd's predictions in the search section & u will find amazing predictions.

 

and the point of this thread.. is what?

 

damn, you guys are ****ing stupid. i m not even gonna address that.

 

I suggest watching some more updated footage of PAC. His balance is no longer an issue. Offesnisvely or defensively. Part of why PAC is so elusive defensively is due to his great balance and footwork.

Seriously.....PAC catches a bad wrap with regards to his "D" but when you look at hard, cold numbers....PAC's opponents have a very hard time finding their target. Even JMM who normally lands at 40% + connect percentage was only landing at a 32% connect percentage on PAC which is ABOVE average for PAC opponents.

PAC's footwork is on par with Floyd. They have very different styles....but both are very effective. Floyd's footwork is more DEFENSIVELY based where PAC's footwork has more of a OFFENSIVE foundation. But both men are better than average in both departments.

For you to say PAC rarely ever uses angles has me question you ever watching PAC's more recent fights. Angles is how PAC sets up his offense which is CONSTANT. I'm not sure how you can claim to be a boxing fan...speaking on this topic and be so completely off base as to not know PAC implements and uses angles as a key part of his offensive and defensive game plan.

Comparing Josh vs PAC and PWill vs Winky is where you begin to show why you have such a warpped perception of this situation. Wink wasn't a SHELL...who was afraid to engage and take chances. And YES....PAC did use angles but they didn't help. When you are faced with a guy hell bent on SURVIVING it's hard to no only look good but more importantly...get a stoppage. PAC did what he had to do with what he was given in the Josh fight. Taking a few punches from Josh jsut to try to get him to open up didn't even work but a lot of folks feel that PAC showed defensive flaws.:verysad PAC was baiting Josh who was looking to make it 12 rounds. Unfortunately the bait wasn't enough for Josh to risk losing like Cotto, Ricky and DLH had in the past.

 

I'll hold you on your assumption that marg will beat pac. i just dont want nobody coming here tellin everyone marg was a fixed figt, or a bum, undeserving.....etc....etc..once pac is done with him

 

:deal :hey