Pacquaio legacy is going to be questionable

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MrPR, Jun 20, 2009.


Page 6 of 7
  1. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Why are you cursing at me? what the **** is yo problem!!?? Did i curse at u? what you mean shut the ****!?!?! are u serious? u SHUT THE **** UP!!! people cant express their opinions with out getting cursed out 2day!!! seriously how old are you!!??? u cant reply to me like an adult!?? u ****en pathetic!!
     
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    #76
  2. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    You said Manny was better at l47 and on the same breath you said he beat a drained fighter like dela Hoya. You better make up your mind. Can he beat these guys like Cotto, Shane, Floyd, etc. who are not weight drained and can even balooned to l60. You must be out of your mind, son!
     
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    #77
  3. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Well yes Oscar waz drained...but then again Manny looked very good with his perfromance,he looked fast and very effective and being at 147 didnt affect him at all and everything just came together and dats how Delahoya waz stopped!!!
     
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    #78
  4. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Did I curse you? I am just owning your ass with these stupid posts you are putting here.
     
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    #79
  5. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Well once again,Delahoya waz drained yes....but then again Manny perfromance looked very good,he very fast and very effective at that new weight and being at147 didnt effect him at all and thats when everything came together and Delahoya waz stopped
     
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    #80
  6. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    YOU TOLD ME TO SHUT THE **** UP!! THere waz no need for that!!! if u dont agree with me,o well,u dont have have 2 curse at me,act like a ****ing adult my ni99a,real talk WTF IS WRONG WIT U!!??
     
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    #81
  7. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Yeah, you are saying now that Pac looked good fighting drained dela Hoya. And he can do the same to fighters who can bulk up to 160 like Shane. If dela Hoya can come down at a catchweight, why can't the others do? As I have said, Pac has his own limitation as far as weight is concerned. Roach knows better than you do.
     
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    #82
  8. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says... I question the questionabilty of ESB'ers questioning the merits of certain fighters which shouldn't be questioned. Without a questionable doubt, some ppl here are wrong.
     
    hmm, Jun 21, 2009
    hmm, Jun 21, 2009
    #83
  9. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    So what's your credential to back you up since you talked like you're better than Roach. In your initial post you disagreed w/ him. Should I believe you or Roach? Come on, trainers know their fighters more than a keyboard pounder like you. So, STFU!
     
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    #84
  10. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    did i say i waz ****ing better then roach *******!!! Im just expressing my ****en opinion,and yea so waht i disagree with roach u got a problem wit dat!!?? Its alright for people to disagree with eachother,so u shut the **** up!!!!
     
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    MrPR, Jun 21, 2009
    #85
  11. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    I am also expessing my opinion that you're a stupid poster. :lol: Yes, you can disagree w/ Roach but who are you to tell what Roach is supposed to do. You're making a fool of yourself, ****ing dumbwit!
     
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    #86
  12. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Hmm.... Pacquiao's speed moved up with him but I doubt it increased. Pacquiao fought a drained ODH. He looked good but he is not best at 147. Mosley and Cotto are no longer light welterweights, but I'm pretty sure that Fraud Gayweather can make it to 140 without draining himself.

    Pacquiao is still small at 140. He only weigh-in at 138, I bet he could stay at 135 if he really wants to. Anyway, at 140 Pacquiao will hydrate to 148 or149. 140pounders hydrates up 150+. Endurance and size will be Pacquiao's disadvantage.
     
    Knives7, Jun 21, 2009
    Knives7, Jun 21, 2009
    #87
  13. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Pacquiao legacy has been sealed since he was born.
     
    buckdacious, Jun 21, 2009
    buckdacious, Jun 21, 2009
    #88
  14. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    Manny's resume is a over inflated glossy bag of ****

    Aside from Barerra one, its just old, shot or weight drained fighters, or actual loses dressed as wins

    **** Roach, **** Arum, and **** Manny
     
    radab, Jun 21, 2009
    radab, Jun 21, 2009
    #89
  15. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Make sure you wipe your tears before you sleep, son. :lol:
     
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    Soriano, Jun 21, 2009
    #90
Page 6 of 7