Pacquiao almost KO'd for the 3RD time against a fighter two divisions smaller!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MIP4P1, Sep 24, 2009.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    well there are scientists during the mediation..are you better than a scientist??
     
  2. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009

    medical exam and blood tests are the same
     
  3. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    What?

    The test he took was to check for any diseases, such as any STDs.

    If Pac had HIV, he would not be allowed to fight. That was a MEDICAL test.


    A PED is different. You have to be looking for PEDs which they were not.

    I don't need to be a scientist to know that.
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    A medical blood test is not the same as a PED blood test.

    While blood is taken as is needed with both test.

    When sent back to a lab, the medical test is looking for diseases and other things along that line.

    It is not looking for the things that are needed to check for PEDs.
     
  5. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    then that really makes floyd is ducking pac..its like saying i want you take the drug tests
     
  6. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    How?

    You said it's okay for Pac to change his mind, now it's not okay for Floyd?

    You're bias and a hypocrite. I can't even believe I wasted time with you.
     
  7. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    well there are scientists that assures floyd is ok during the mediation..:deal i believe on scientists than wannabe experts like you
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    no, I would have the same opinion.

    truth is, the issue that caused the fight to be cancelled was brought into play by Mayweather, not Pac. The terms that Pac brought into play did not cause the fight to be cancelled.

    Pac definately did not cause the fight to be cancelled.
     
  9. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Really? Pac didn't.

    So who backed out of negotiations?
     
  10. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    its floyd that is demanding..if pac is the bigger guy while floyd is the smaller guy and said to floyd that i will be fighting you at 154 or 160 which floyd cant make then ill be mad at pac..dumb your so idiot..i cant believe im wasting my time on you..:p
     
  11. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    fact is void sr doesnt want to void jr to fight pac..thats why void jr demanded the drug testing
     
  12. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    where eze "easy" boy?
     
  13. SOUTHERMOST

    SOUTHERMOST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    216
    Oct 24, 2006
    Good observation from Roger regarding fighters with no righ hand but Clottey have a decent right hand he was tagging Margo all night long it will be interesting theory on the next Pac fight.
     
  14. difO

    difO Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,682
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    lol 'how shot and ruined hatton was'

    man ***gots like you make me lol sometimes. honestly, so hatton was ruined after a loss to p4p #1, and moving up a division? i dont think hes good, but he certainly didnt suddenly turn ****, he was just always ****. im glad boxers arent like you, 1 loss and they'd be out of the scene for good
     
  15. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Why the hell is this abortion of a thread bumped? It was a complete an utter failure and proven as irrelevant in the Cotto fight.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.