Pacquiao almost KO'd for the 3RD time against a fighter two divisions smaller!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MIP4P1, Sep 24, 2009.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
    MIP4P1 keep up the good work
     
  2. IPitydaFo0l

    IPitydaFo0l ATG in the making Full Member

    1,684
    0
    Nov 16, 2008

    :lol: Of course you would say that.
     
  3. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    THERE are two sides of the coin hater!

    If the fight of JMM vs PBF happened first before the fight of pac vs hatton and pac vs odlh. You'll think PAC is hopeless. How many rounds did ODLH last with PBF compared to PAC?! How many rounds did it take PBF to KO hatton COMPARED to the number of rounds that PAC demolished Hatton..

    and REMEMBER HATTON was fought not on his natural weight when he fought PBF. PAC beat Hatton on his NATURAL weight.

    I wouldn't be surprised if you don't UNDERSTAND this though you don't need ROCKET SCIENCE to understand this :rofl:lol:
     
  4. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
    MIP4P1 has the *******s rattled :D
     
  5. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    :rofl:roflwhat a load of trash
     
  6. IPitydaFo0l

    IPitydaFo0l ATG in the making Full Member

    1,684
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    I don't know man. But in the real world Pac fans are feeling pretty damn good :D
     
  7. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007

    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    You wanna silence MIP4PI?! Ask him this question..

    Who has a heart of a champion who is willing to face challenges. Who are the boxers who are willing to go out of their comfort ZONE and MOVE up to 2 weight DIVISIONS to fight a big name in that weight category?!



    In the three names below, who among the two boxers already did that and who among the three boxers WILL NEVER DO THAT.GOING OUT OF HIS COMFORT ZONE.

    a)PAC,
    b)JMM
    c) PBF

    You don't need rocket science to figure it out :lol::rofl:lol:
     
  8. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007

    rattled?!:rofl:lol::rofl:hi:
     
  9. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    Thanks! :good
     
  10. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    Wow, I'm almost impressed at his dedication towards hating Pac. I mean, he really goes out of his way to look for new angles on how to hate the guy.
     
  11. Blue_Ray

    Blue_Ray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    0
    Apr 17, 2009
    If your point is that Mayweather can beat Pacquiao, no one is disputing that possibility but you don't need post anti-Pac threads just to prove this point. This is senseless and waste of time.
     
  12. IPitydaFo0l

    IPitydaFo0l ATG in the making Full Member

    1,684
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    :rofl Right on man, make sure to bet the farm against the PacMan if you're so sure about it :good All 2 dollars of it..
     
  13. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    To answer your question.

    I'm actually picking Pacquiao to win. Cotto has no right hand, no defense, poor reflexes, and is getting busted up more than ever.

    Stylistically, Pacquiao should win very impressively since he has every advantage except size. Pacquiao's mobility, combined with Cotto's tendency to need to plant his feet to get off punches, will neutralize any size or power advantage he would have.
     
  14. ku_las

    ku_las Active Member Full Member

    503
    0
    Mar 7, 2008
    This **** sucker never stop talking ****...same as their IDOL BIG MOUTH FLOYD...
     
  15. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    Not a good idea!

    Save that money and put it on Money Mayweather. :good
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.