"Pacquiao always fighting people coming off a loss"

Marquez was a huge underdog in both Pac III and IV

I think ODLH was favored to beat Pac
Hatton was a significant dog
Cotto and Pac was close to even with a lot of people thinking Cotto would win
Pac was a favorite against Margo but a lot of people thought Margo would win because of sheer size/strength
Clottey was coming off of a razor thin loss to Cotto in which many thought he won. Was a good fight to be made.

So while these guys in recent years had lost, they were still live names and very good opposition. Some of the victories rate higher than Floyd's respective victories over the same opponents (Hatton and Cotto) and some pale in comparison (Marquez III, ODLH)

I hate to keep beating the long dead Pacman Floyd horse.

 

Let's just face the truth. Pac is the star he is today from piggy backing on Mayweather
back.

 

Are you saying Pac loses on purpose to give fighters coming off losses a boost of confidence?

I knew it was something fishy about Marquez knocking Pacman out! Oh Pacquiao, you old rascal!

 

Let's defend Mayweather who needs a ****ing catchweight for his fights. Fighter of the decade?



His name wasn't Mayweather.

 

Lies, and overexaggerations!.

The DLH that fought Pac was tailor made for him. He came in at 147 pounds. Pac came in at 148. And he had Freddy Roach in his corner who knew Oscar strengths and weaknesses.

Hatton was no dog. Hatton had just loss to Floyd, he was never the same after that fight. Everyone knows that.

He should have fought Cotto at 147. Cotto said it himself. "If they want a rematch Pacquiao has to come up this time, I'm not draining myself"

Margarito? really? No one had Margarito winning that fight. He was exposed for his wraps my Mosley. That fight was a gimme fight for Pac.

And CLottey? LOL No rebuttal for that one. Thats a joke and you know it

 

The best and only fighters he fought that were on impressive and lengthy winning streaks were:

Bradley
Sasakul
Ledwaba
JMM I
Barrera I

A surprising number of everyone else on his resume fit the opposite of my above criteria.

 

Cool, now go ask anyone around whos the best fighter of the ERA.

A decade is 10 years.

An Era is a long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.

Everyone agrees Floyds the best of his era.

 

Considering the fact that a lot of people feel Mosley could of got the decision vs Cotto and that almost everybody feel Marquez beat Pac 3/4 times those are bad examples

 

Mosley didn't get pwned by Cotto Watch the damned fight first

 

:deal

 

This content is protected

 

Holy sweet christ you are stupid. Not only are some of these literally wrong, but do you understand what "coming off a loss" means? By your definition, any fighter that isn't undefated is "coming off a loss". atsch

Secondly, even if you do want to use that ******ed logic:

Marquez IV coming off a loss within two fights FLOYD
Can you even focking count? First of all, it was Marquez III, not IV, and he had victories over Diaz, Katsidis and Ramos before he fought Pacquiao. That is THREE fights in case you're having difficulty keeping score. Facts are pesky little things sometimes.

 

Lol thats the thing. Hes no ones hero. We dont look at him and see a God. Thats the difference between Pacquiao fans and Mayweather SUPPORTERS.

You guys make it seem like Pacquiao can do no wrong, and make up excuses for him.

We supporters just stick to the facts because the facts never change and are more than enough to prove that hes better then Pacquiao.

You people treat Pacquiao like hes Jesus

Floyds human, and hes real. I respect that.