Pacquiao and math

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Jun 23, 2010.


  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Serioulsy, Pacquiao cannot mathematically justify a 50/50 split..The numbers are not there backing him up.

    Perhaps 55/45, but 50/50, Pac has no real claim.

    The only thing I can't think of for not budging is he's afraid one needles. :yep :deal :lol:

    On a serious note though, first he wouldn't budge on the FAIR random testingn stip, and now he doesn't want to budge on what is fair also, the purse????

    Yet Pac has put in place more stips in his last 5 fights than Mayweather has his entire career. :think

    Seems like Pac really doesn't want to

    1. Fight Mayweather

    or

    2. Taken random blood tests
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
  3. Bobby Heenan

    Bobby Heenan Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,248
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
  4. Bobby Heenan

    Bobby Heenan Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,248
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
  5. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    And that is what matters when it comes to $$$.
     
  6. abujafar

    abujafar Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    Floyd was numero uno p4p when he fought oscar:deal

    Who got the bigger purse:huh

    p4p fotd has no bearing on purse split, earning power does.
     
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Really???! You can't comprehend that "he who brings more dollars makes more dollars"?

    It's probably why you'd never be financially succesful. You're a dumb as Pacquiao if you can't undertsand why 55-45 or even 60-40 for Flyd would be fair.
     
  8. papolamuerte

    papolamuerte Yo soy La Muerte! Full Member

    3,257
    5
    Apr 21, 2008

    Ditto!!!:happy

    UliUli....Now explain to us how and why PBF deserves 60-40....:huh
     
  9. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Careful, your going to make his head explode. :yep
     
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Ditto ? :patsch

    Explain why Oscar got a way bigger purse against P4P#1 in Hopkins, against P4P#1 in Mayweather, and against P4P#1 in Whitaker?



    you lose. ;)
     
  11. papolamuerte

    papolamuerte Yo soy La Muerte! Full Member

    3,257
    5
    Apr 21, 2008
    In the Whitaker fight Oscar was the draw....
    In the Hopkins/PBF fights Oscar was the draw / co-promoter (so of course he is going to pay himself the bigger share because he would have to be stupid not to) right?:good
     
  12. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    BS floyd agreed to a 50-50 the first time around and now that pac agreed to the 14 days testing all of a sudden 50-50 is no good:patsch
     
  13. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Huh? Pac was P4P #1 when Oscar faced him, Floyd was P4P #1 when Oscar faced him, Hops was P4P #1 when Oscar faced him. They all got smaller pieces of the pie. You reinforce your stupidity on this forum daily with this anti-mayweather garbage. At least post somewhat logically.
     
  14. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Yeah, since then Floyd has proven further that he is the bigger draw! His fight with Mosley did TWICE the PPV buys than Pacs fight since, and his gate did much more too. :deal
     
  15. abujafar

    abujafar Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    You mention Draw and co-promoter as factors.:good

    But nowhere did you mention awards and mythical standings as factors:huh

    Now apply that to PBF vs Pac