Pacquiao and math

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Jun 23, 2010.


  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Oh great..another ******* alias. :roll:

    Read the entire thread, bend over, spread open asscheeks..say goodnight. :good
     
  2. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    who's alt are you?
     
  3. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    7 pages of Pacquiao and math?

    How can you call this math?
    Why shouldn't it be 51-49, 52-48, 53-47?
    Show me a mathematical way how you came up with 60-40 or 55-45 as the best purse split for this fight.

    You are so confident that you've figured out a way to split the money:patsch
    come on show us a formula...until you show us how you computed this I suggest you shut up or ask the mods to delete this stupid ass thread you created.
     
  4. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    Not an alt, I'm new here but I always read ESB threads.
     
  5. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Yeah, and I'm your Irish uncle. :patsch
     
  6. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Who said it HAS to be 60-40 or 55-45??? To me they are reasonable, but 52-48 might work...

    This content is protected
     
  7. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    We'll I don't have to prove that **** to you...:lol:

    but please don't try to change the topic...
     
  8. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010

    That is not math my friend....damn you are really stupid:patsch
     
  9. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Actually it is in a lteral sense.

    It is a formula by which a result is concluded.

    It is a study of relationships, properties, quantities and sets to determine an answer.

    Mathematically Mayweather is the bigger draw, has generated a sum larger than Pac, therefore Mayweather has proven to be greater in terms of revenue. Therefore one concludes that the person who brings more gets more.

    Simple math...But considering you're a *******, I don't expect you to comprehend.
     
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    DAMN *******s got seriously OWNED today..again. :lol:
     
  11. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010

    ok Uli let's resolve this ****
    I'm not here to argue with you regarding the 50-50 split on this fight..
    I just can't let stupid things go without getting it corrected...

    Now you clearly got you definition from the internet but it is pretty obvious that you don't use math..I don't blame you here..one does not really need math when you just watch cars go by...

    You are saying that you figured out a way using math to come up with the best split for this fight. show us a formula please....math is an exact science which will result in an exact number....imagine if we built buildings and bridges using your definition of math:patsch

    Please don't say you used math...it insults my intelligence...
     
  12. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    You're obviously to stupid to understand...If you don't see why Mayweather deserves a bigger purse BASED of HARD FACTS..kindly GTFO! :hi:
     
  13. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    i only care for the fight to be made, not the purse split. but whatever makes you happy man. you're just having your way of looking for someone to put a finger on when the fight doesn't get made. you are backing up the terms that you know team pac may very well have a problem with and have already cocked your finger for pointing. all i've seen is hate from you since day one. seems to me you're just waiting for a moment where you can smack something on pac's face and that would make you happy. seriously, i just hope the fight gets made for the benefit of the fans. two of the best in this era facing off hasn't come about in a while.
     
  14. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010

    Man you are getting exposed....again I am not arguing if mayweather should get the bigger share...what I'm saying is your method is flawed...
    you are saying you came up with the solution using math but we clearly see that its just crap..

    If you can't see that then you must really be stupid....

    Please don't reply to this anymore...I don't know if there is a limit to how stupid a person can get...and is not the day I would like to have that answered
     
  15. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    No, I'm talking reality. *******s go rampages, hateful rampages, trying to discredit Floyd, photoshopping pictures of Floyd, claiming Pac is this and that, calling Floyd a homo, a ***** etc... The worst thing I'll call Pac is dumb-because he is- and that's about it.

    *******s are claiming Mayweather is ducking Pac, when evidence proves Pac is the ducker.

    1. Pac doesn't want the fight because of drug tests.
    2. Pac accepts drug test.
    3. Pac doesn't want fight because he wants 50/50 split????

    HE doesn't deserve to DEMAND 50/50, when Floyd is clearly the bigger draw.

    Pac is a bigger primadonna than Floyd. A shame.