Pacquiao and math

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Jun 23, 2010.


Page 8 of 18
  1. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Dude..I don't give a **** if you THINK my method is FLAWED... The FACT of the matter is that FLOYD is the bigger draw, therefore Pac has NO RIGHT to DEMAND 50/50 or NO FIGHT..Clearly based off the numbers if the fight doesn't get made, it's because Pac priced himself out...

    very simple...now kindly **** OFF :hi:
     
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    #106
  2. dahoe

    dahoe Member Full Member

    282
    0
    May 2, 2009
    UliUli, the biggest dumbass on all on ESB
     
    dahoe, Jun 23, 2010
    dahoe, Jun 23, 2010
    #107
  3. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    AGAIN NOT MATH:patsch

    It's ok Uli...you just have to say...
    "OK my bad...it is not math...it just came up with numbers and put them together to sway my decision to mayweahter's side"

    And a couple of posts ago you were happy that you owned *******s today because you came up with a solution for the purse split.

    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    #108
  4. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    And you are still replying....:patsch
    Please stop replying because I'm enjoying every minute of this while you are getting more stupid every time you reply...
     
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    #109
  5. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Whatever rocks your boat bro. :good

    For the record there are two *******s in this thread who now accept that Mayweather should get a bigger purse based on the sum of revenue each fighter generated.

    Call my formula whatever you want, math, english, history, whatever..the the result is the same...Floyd Mayweather is a bigger draw, therefore should get the bigger purse, and if Pac won't budge outside of 50/50, then he obviously doesn't want the fight.
     
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    #110
  6. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    i have to disagree with you uli. both bring enough to the table so i see no reason not to agree on 50-50 if that is what it takes to have the fight made. but like i said, i don't care for the split, both camps just have to agree. this could be the biggest fight we could have in years not in terms of revenue for them but in magnitude for the fans and history of boxing as well. i'm also not into pointing fingers at this time. the negotiations are just being darn too complicated and fight fans seem to just take on a side and happily put a finger on someone.
     
    Leonard, Jun 23, 2010
    Leonard, Jun 23, 2010
    #111
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Sure buddy. :good

    Just answer this:

    Who is the bigger draw in terms of PPV buys?
     
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    #112
  8. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010

    That is one ***** that is high on his chair...
    remember you get more respect here when you accept you are wrong...
    It's ok...some of the best posters here do that man...

    I told you...I'm not here to discuss the split...it's your method that is flawed...you make it sound like it is a clearcut mathematical method when it is not....
    have a good day mate...:smoke
     
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    #113
  9. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    This thread is dedicated to the split..so have a good day yourself as you kindly GTFO. :rasta

    Btw, my method is the way the vast majority of purses in boxing are determined. ;)

    Dumb noobie.
     
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    #114
  10. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010

    look at the title you stupid ****!:patsch
     
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    #115
  11. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    The moment I saw your title I already smiled...this is going to be a good day...:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    #116
  12. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    You want math?
    Show me a formula on how you can split the PPV buys..show me which percentage of the people bought for floyd..
    remember it was always two of them on the ring drawing people...

    Just don't say it is math...there is no way you can do that...

    I hate talking to stupid people...geesh they just don't learn:patsch
     
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    #117
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Stop standing infront of the mirror then. ;) :hi:
     
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    IsaL, Jun 23, 2010
    #118
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    PH|LLA, Jun 23, 2010
    PH|LLA, Jun 23, 2010
    #119
  15. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    That is your comeback?....what you read that in the funny pages of the paper? I shouldn't have expected too much of a person who does not know math...my bad...

    Stick to the argument brother....I know you are getting pounded so might as well stop..:lol:
     
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    jansby mac, Jun 23, 2010
    #120
Page 8 of 18