Pacquiao and Mayweather were fighting at 106 at 16 yrs old

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by B-Flu, Jan 30, 2010.


  1. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    I really have no other response to this post but :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Funny because its true

    He would also make JCC look like David Diaz.
    :deal:deal:deal:deal:deal:deal:deal:deal
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Wether he was losing the fight or not, the goal of the sport is to win the fight itself. If you knock out your opponent, that counts. Lineal champion at 19 years old is ****ing amazing regardless of who he lost to after. And he didn't win it off some scrub either. All the excuses in the world can't take that away from him.
     
  4. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    I'm not trying to take away from his accomplishment. Still, all the excuse in the world can't change the fact that Manny was not a well rounded fighter at that point hence the reason why he was KO'd by an average fighter.
     
  5. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    :lol:

    Tell me more.

    :smoke
     
  6. Twirdman

    Twirdman Active Member Full Member

    538
    0
    Nov 24, 2009
    No he was not a complete fighter at that point, whats your point. Remember he had no amature career so those were some of his first fights. What did you expect him to go into the ring as the greatest boxer ever. No you don't start boxing with all the skills, talent, and athleticism to dominate, you pick those up over time.

    I mean I think everyone agrees that the Pac who lost to Torecampo or Singsurat was not as good as this Pac. That's like a no **** moment. You also have to admit those losses don't diminish the skills and talent he posses now. Just like Mayweather's losses at amateur don't diminish his career. We realize boxers gain skill sets and become better fighters.
     
  7. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Then along came Roach.................
     
  8. knotty150

    knotty150 Active Member Full Member

    1,250
    0
    Jun 3, 2009
    Pac should have fought people he knows he could have beaten, even at 16. Then he would have kept his 0.
     
  9. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    :good
     
  10. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Give it a rest with these boring threads you clown.
    No-one gives a ****.
     
  11. IPitydaFo0l

    IPitydaFo0l ATG in the making Full Member

    1,684
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    This dood is actin like he's teachin us something new. ****ing idiot :rofl
     
  12. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    You hold it against Mayweather that he didn't turn pro sooner.

    Like he could of easily illegally did it.
     
  13. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    This content is protected


    Mayweather: 106
    Pacquiao: 106


    This content is protected


    Mayweather: 150
    Pacquiao: 144


    Thank you for providing us some facts. See how that can work against you?

    If ******s think Pac is on steroids, WTF do you think Floyd is on?
     
  14. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    he legally could of started a year earlier, but he didnt.

    he would rather have an olympic silver medal than to become a teenage champion.
     
  15. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Yup.

    You win, Floyds a ***** for wanting to get a gold medal instead of a world championship.


    :patsch