you are ******ed. you didn't even know that morales' camp has all the rematch options that time. pac's team has no choice but to fight morales' if they (morales' camp) exercised their right for a 2nd and 3rd rematch which is what happened. so you mean to say that pac should have fought raheem instead and ignore the stipulations of the contract? *****s like to say raheem but didn't even know the circusmtances then.
Raheem's win over EM's is better than Pac's win, he beat him first.:deal Pac should have fought Raheem instead of EM.
raheem beat him at 135, where morales didn't trained well and was bloated. pac beat him at 130 where he beat pac the first time. also that was the only time morales was stopped. the other time, it was still from pacquiao. until today, no other fighter has stopped morales even if he is shot to **** and is fighting at 140. pac's stoppage of morales at 130 >>> than raheem's pot-shotting over morales at 135
Raheem was clearly being ducked by Pacquiao-Pac woulda been troubled by some Zahir's movement too-I see why they kept him away from em...Styles make fights and Arum didn't want Manny near Raheem-woulda killed one of his main fighters at the time.
And this will be the first one that would be in their prime.:deal I give Pac full credit for facing Bradley and if he wins he will get full credit from me.
Clottey didn't show up to fight and was coming off a loss. Not to mention he hasn't been heard from since. He gets no credit for that heavy bag session.:deal
read my post above and learn. raheem is a hyped african-american who was beaten immediately by freitas after beating a poorly-trained and bloated morales at 135.
he was in his prime but the key is: 1.) was he african-AMERICAN 2.) was he "slick" clottey is nieither