I came to this forum being a fan of both pacquiao and mayweather. Though on here it seems pacquiao is hated more than any other fight where as Floyd is praised. I saw a thread on here saying "who has the best resume of the last 20 years" and pacquiao won by a landslide. My question Is if pacquiao has this great resume and wins then why does no one rank him above Floyd in an atg list?
Pacquiao is a lot more loved in casual circles than with hardcore fans it seems, Casuals still actually rank him as the best boxer in the world, as funny as that may seem his Hype is that BIG
I think Pac has the better resume, but he didn't win all those bouts, so you have to take that into consideration.
YES!!!! Now stop it with these "floyd atg?" and "manny atg?" type threads. As the years go they will be more appreciated, especially after they retire.
Pac is a great fighter, Floyd is a great fighter. Can we move the discussion beyond arguing about Pac vs Floyd? Time will tell. Just STFU.
Of course he is. Someone who actually tries to say that Pacquiao or Mayweather for that matter, is not an all time great should have their head examined.