The judges' scoring diverged widely. One had it 115-110 for Marquez, another 115-110 for Pacquiao. Judge Burt Clements sealed the draw with a 113-113 score, but he admitted making a mistake. He should have had the first round 10-6 for Pacquiao instead of 10-7. Pacquiao would have won a decision. http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=3281702
Is this supposed to be news? That has been known for ages. The judges aren't always right. I mean, judges actually thought Chavez drew with Whitaker, and Holyfield with Lewis. The public knows who really won fights most of the time, but in this case, I think a draw was a fairly just outcome.
i still think jmm did enough to squeak and win the first and manny might of won the 2nd. both were damn close and could of gone either way
I thought JMM done enough to win but could see why they gave a draw... just. The second fight was a 100% JMM win.
First fight was definitely Pac's. Second one was much closer, I think a draw would have been fair so in the end it doesn't really matter. Bring on the third fight !!
first fight = pac won. judge admitted scoring error. second fight = pac won. geeh, if you are still having a hard time deciding for this fight, let me give you the tie breaker. This content is protected :good