Pacquiao-Bradley or Pacquiao-Clottey?

+1 I like this. I wish this were to happen instead.

Although we can see who has more balls can't we?

Even though Mayweather should prove he can face top WW not PAC since he already destroyed cotto.

But you gotta love pac for accepting tough challenges and wanting to give us a good fight.

 

bradley has a better chance than clottey...he can box, clottey has that winky style where he will not be able to get off on pac...this is why pac chose him...he will ko clottey or just beat his ass with his speed but he would never have beaten floyd so who cares...he will continue to fight big guys who are drained or have no defense and avoid the slick fighters

 

the answer is NOT the guy who won't take a 14 day cutoff on a random blood test and fight PBF....PBF should not be getting his balls questioned when pac clearly lied over and over and finally dropped out to avoid a drug test

 

The problem is that a lot of welterweights are Toprank fighters and there aren't many opions for Floyd, other than Quintana or Collazo type fighters. That's why he should have taken the Pac fight.

 

double post.

 

Pac showed Floyd who is really in control, If mayweather had balls he would have never even asked for extra testing. Pac obliged and offered a 24 Day cut off just to be nice. Mayweather rejected it. Pac will not oblige further then that since he does not even have to consider the extra testing as it has never been done and is uncecassary considering pacs career of always being clean.

 

I'm a big Clottey fan, but i think Bradley has the better chance to defeat Pac. I don't think Clottey will defeat Pac just because of his punch output and Pac's speed. This is a bad matchup for Clottey stylistically i believe. This is actually the first time that I call a fight against Clottey.

 

I would prefer Pac facing Bradley at 140 for all the marbles there, and that is because I feel Bradley is a top tier P4P fighter right now.

As for facing Clottey, I am surprised Roach did not see any problem in that. Clottey is more dangerous than Foreman, IMO. A very very tough and physical fight for Pac and which could affect him in his future fights.

In short, both are high risk, low reward fights. Not big-names in terms of fans recognition, but either of the two clearly won't be a walk in the park for the Pacman.

 

Id rather see pac defending his title against Clottey rather than fighting Bradley. Clottey IMO is more dangerous than Bradley. Then fight the winner of Berto-Mosley then retire. Fucc Void.

 

I'd rather see Pac vs Bradley so we can see Pacquiao at his best again and against the best the division has to offer.

Clottey is a winnable fight but all things considered Pac will never be as good at WW as he is at JrWW because relative to the division average he is really small.

 

How about the guy who looked dominant in a shutout victory rather than the guy who lost his fight because he was afraid to throw punches.

 

Clottey is way more dangerous than Bradley. Seriously for the money hes getting paid against Pac, Id rather DiBella milk Bradley more because this could seriously derail his career.

I cant even fathom a Bradley/Clottey fight..this is how Pac has been defying logic.

 

hmm says . . .

I like bradley but I chose clottey since he's the bigger opponenet. Might as well stay at WW I guess..

 

:deal

 

pacman has been defying logic for years, how about floyd for fighting matt hatton/malignantgi, isn't that too much logic?. gtf outta here..