Pacquiao can be another Sugar Ray Robinson...Roach

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PacDbest, Sep 10, 2007.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    KG, you've yapping all this Crap that Pac Beat a Shot & Aging MAB & EM. So when is the Prime MAB??? When is the Prime EM???

    Give you a Comparison:

    DLH got a Gift Decision over Past his Prime Whitaker.

    Floyd got a SD against past his prime Part time Boxer DLH.

    Pac totally Destroys a 29 yr Old #3 P4P MAB. MAB won only one rd Courtesy of Lawrence Cole. After that MAB the 1st to KO Ayala, & become Champ again beating top 5 P4P Morales.

    Pac is The first to Knock-Out a 29 yr old Morales. Annihilates him in 3 rds on the rubbermatch. After that he Try to Get a Title at 135 & almost got a Win against Diaz.

    Shot Fighters Definition is like Gatti. Annihilated by Lesser opponent.

    Pac Annahilates opponent Prime, Shot or Bum!!!! It doesn't Matter!!!
     
  2. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Kellerman,Atlas,Hoya,Farhood and many Boxing writers.
     
  3. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    You better HOPE to death Barerra doesnt beat him.
     
  4. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    you are going astray here..... pac is nothing at 130 at the moment. but if we have a time zone and warp pac at 130 chavez era, he could easily beat those fighters whom chavez did beat. and please, if there was a ring mag during those times, those greats and cabby drivers wont be there...

    now tell me, is castillo, mayweather, pratchett, rojas, barrios, lockridge, cruz and of course porte will be easily pound per pound 2 if ring mag was around during those days??? :yep:yep:yep
     
  5. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Stop being an idiot. Yes, I called you an idiot.

    I CLEARLY said MAB was past his prime but still very good...didn't I? So where am I yapping about him being shot. Learn to read then talk to me. Stop putting words in my mouth.

    Barrera's prime was from about 94-99. His prime weight was 122. He wasn't prime when he beat Hamed. That is why he changed his style.

    And don't bring up other fighters I didn't mention. You need to pay attention to the topic. Morales has lost 5 of his last 6 fights. He is no where near prime. Morales was beaten by Raheem, badly. That is a lesser opponent.

    Now you answer MY question. How can you say that Pacman has beat nearly all the best fighters in his weight class? He has beaten one top 10 opponent and never fought any of the champions.
     
  6. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    and you better hope that you wont be here after the fight because pac fans will eat you like a polish sausage and bleed you to death when show the pictures of mab begging for his life!!! :D:D:lol::lol:
     
  7. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    You're going astray. I am not into guesswork of where those fighters would rank. And it's irrelevant because Pacman has not fought a P4P fighter here....pay attention now. I said Pacman is not better than Chavez at 130....you just said Pacman is nothing at 130. End of discussion. All that other stuff isn't relevant and I never brought it up.
     
  8. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    No mention of Randall,Whitaker,Taylor,De La Hoya,Camacho,Tszyu?
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Whoever said i was rooting against him?

    I'm a fan of both fighters.

    It is you who will be crying if your boy loses no doubt.I mean you are a fanny of Manny and not Boxing.
     
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He already has lost. That's kinda the point isn't it? And his prime is nearly over. His fighting style, like those before him, will slow him down. Age is not the same as in ring age.
     
  11. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Very lofty goals and that is why i say you better HOPE TO DEATH that he doesnt lose to the aging Barrera.

    His whole legacy will be crushed if he loses this fight.
     
  12. bulakenyo

    bulakenyo Am I a boxing fan yet? Full Member

    8,356
    20
    Jun 2, 2006
    Im outta here guys. Long debates give me headaches. see ya laters.
     
  13. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    you know kg..... i am leading your slow brain at 130 pound pac.. why i am asking you pound per pound material topic here, it is because if you put those fighters at pac of today, they will be terminated by pac. as what i have said, if ring mag was around during those days, they wont be mentioned. even though pac didnt prove anything at 130 yet, but please if you put pac of today vs chavez who defeated those b fighters, then chavez will get pawned. stopped that pac didnt prove anything at 130. pac IS THE MAN AT 130 AND NUMERO DOS at pound per pound please you pathetic!! :yep
     
  14. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    I need to kill some time till Monday Night Football starts.

    What better way than to bring people back down to Earth!
     
  15. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    But didn't I give you two quotes from Roach in the past???

    He said "He''ll KO both MAB & EM". That already happened impressively.

    Floyd trainer said they will murder & Make the Flag wave on DLH & Baldomir That didn't happen.

    Roach is credible!!! I can't say the same with the other coaches!!!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.