Pacquiao can be another Sugar Ray Robinson...Roach

AHAHA what is he supposed to say???

My fighter is probably going to lose??

And he was saying that before the first EM fight and the JMM fight.That's what trainers do.

 

I quite agree with you, but saying he can be the next Ray Robinson? Not in my view. Robinson's the best P4P boxer in history.

 

No doubt everyone loves Pacman.I havent said otherwise.The only thing im saying is that some rabid Pinoy fans vastly overrate him.If he does what you mentioned then no one can say **** about his greatness but until then....

Those salt mines are very famous.I have a hunk laying around the house somewhere.Caves that are of pure rock salt.

 

So you're guessing and trying to play it off as fact.

 

Pacman was the smaller man. If you're so smart PacD, then stop contradicting yourself. Remember, if Pacman LOST at lower weights because he was weight drained, then that means he needed to move up in weight. So he was not the smaller man in those fights. In facts, in the last Morales fight, he was signifiganly larger than Morales....isn't that why you keep pointing out he could fight at 140:deal

That's why you're an idiot. You talk about how small Pacman is when you want to build him up, but then how he was weight drained when he loses and you want an excuse.

Either way, nothing you just said had anything to do with what you asked me. MAB's prime was from about 94 or 95 to 99-00. You don't buy it? Who cares....

 

Where did I say that all fighters over 30 are on the downside of their careers? Where do you guys get this stuff?

I said PACMAN's prime was almost over because of his STYLE, not his age.

 

This has nothing to do with what I said you brainless moron. There is no late in his career. In less than 5 years at the beginning of his career, Pacman jumped from 106 to 122. That's not late in anything. He was growing, and like I said, he cannot be weight drained when he loses, but get credit for being the smaller man when he wins. Simple as that. He was growing and OFTEN ended up fighting smaller men in those weight classes who were naturally that weight, not growing out of that weight at a rapid pace, so much so that he couldn't stay there very long and got so weight drained he lost.

Why would I name another fighter who did whatever you said? Have I disputed that? Ok then....so I guess you should stop mentioning it:deal

 

Even Pac himself wouldnt agree with your bizarre, outrageous, needless nuthugging

 

And I am so sick of mentioning how he moved from 106 to 130 and dominated and no one else has done anything like that.

First off, he won no titles at the 108 weight class. He lost one of his fights at 112. He barely fought at 112 and nearly always weighed over the limit. In less than a year of fighting, he had already had his first fight over 112. So he didn't ever feel comfortable there. A year and a 1/2 after his debut, Pacman had fought over the 115 weight class. So don't give me that crap....he was fighting smaller guys and if I can, I will find his hydrated weights to prove it. So what you said was CRAP.

As far as no one doing what he did. At that weight class? No...

But let me tell you this. Roy Jones fought at 154 in his debut. He later won a HW belt. That's moving up 46lbs. Hearns fought at 147....he won a title at 175, 28lbs north. Duran started at 122 and won a title at 160, thats 38lbs.

You get my drift? Moving up that far in weight is NOT unprecendented.

 

See you are stupid. You can't read can you? I said in THIS thread that PBF is no where NEAR SRR. So why would I start a thread about it? And Jones is FAR greater than Pacman...so lets keep him out of it.

No one here mentioned PBF until YOU did. So perhaps you should start a thread about him. I don't think you get how great the OTHER fighters are that you constantly downgrade so you can say Pacman is better than they are.

 

exactly my thoughts when i saw the title of the thread...pac doesnt make my top 30 atg just yet