http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/240287/pacquiao-best-boxer-2000s Warning(for floydettes/haters): reading this article is dangerous to your health...:rofl
Expect to hear "well The Ring is just a magazine and ever since Golden Boy bought it it lost credibility", "Pacquiao's on steroids", etc...
They will only say that if Fraud himself says it,cause for those sheeps whatever he says is the absolute truth.
whats great about Pac is that this guy came out of nowhere to become an ATG, whereas the hardcore fanbase expect out ATGs to come out of the Olympics with a medal, have an undefeated record for a long time, have lots of showcase fights....etc.
lol @ Calzaghe the rationale behind the pacman decision is good (rankings at different weights) but i'd like to see more on how they ranked them.
Could you have given me a more obvious answer? Obviously by resume but how was it determined. Pac's resume ain't that special. *Waits for bait to be taken*