Pacquiao, decade's best by Ring!!!

a yahoo internet blog?? really dude?

if you search deep enough im sure you will run across a blogger from a yahoo website that has ZERO credibility.... :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

See I know some dumbass was going to try to pull this one.

Please...I'm willing to bet that had Floyd fought Ivan Calderon you would have defended him.

 

The Ring have it right.

There's an argument for Floyd, a good argument though it doesn't contain the main points mentioned by those rooting for him. His being undefeated means little considering the competition he's avoided in his career. And what does beating Juan Manuel Marquez as convincingly as he did prove? He only did what we all expected of him in that performance. Pacquiao fought Marquez at Marquez's weight. Marquez was a ridiculous fight for Mayweather, a big name who Floyd and his team knew would make for an easy victory. Look at how Pacquiao destroyed De La Hoya, far more convincingly than Floyd yet it's by no means a case that weighs in Pacquiao's favor.

Floyd fails to get the nod ultimately because his resume could be far more impressive than it is. Not that it isn't impressive but Pacquiao's is better.

 

The one who went up 2 divisions up to meet him on an agreed weight and still got f*cked on the weigh in? I bet if Calderon was ranked #2 and Floyd managed to get a fight with him, you'd still be lickin those sacs wont you?

 

Oh you said it already..

 

Pac has being voted best of the decade on every list I've seen so far. It's universal.

I think only Mayweather nuthuggers will deny he deserves that accolade.

 

:rofl

 

Pac is best while Void is still hiding.

 

But GBP owns PBF's butt, and that increases its credibility.

Is GBP sleeping with the enemy now?

 

This just goes to show how Pacquiao is SOOO FAR AWAY from the rest.

Because eventhough GBP owns Ring (FMJ backed by GBP since his return), they can easily slip FMJ to #1 like how they make BHop and Mosley (and Oscar when he's still active) always inside P4P top 5. But in this case they can't do that, the GAP is that wide.

 

Here's a little dose of reality for you.

This content is protected

It says "

This content is protected

". Your link is the opinion of one blogger "Martin Rogers".

Meanwhile, here is The Ring's Rating Panel:

This content is protected

The Ring Rating Panel

Mark Abrams - 15rounds.com
Carlos Arias - Orange County Register
Eric Armit - British Boxing Yearbook
Bill Calogero - thedailysports.com
Nick Charles - Showtime
Brian Doogan - London Sunday Times
Coyote Duran - doghouseboxing.com
J. Michael Falgoust - USA Today
Steve Farhood - Showtime
Doug Fischer - ringtv.com
Margaret Goodman, M.D. - secondsout.com
Lee Groves - CompuBox
Jack Hirsch - Boxing News
Michael Hirsley - Chicago Tribune
Keith Idec - Herald News of New Jersey
Carlos Irusta - El Grafico
Ted Lerner - The Ring
Marc Lichtenfeld - Through The Ropes
Jessi Losado - Telemundo
Scott Mallon - asianboxingnews.com
Rich Marotta - FSN-TV, KFI/KLAC Radio

This content is protected

This content is protected

Barry McGuigan - ITV
Marty Mulcahey - maxboxing.com
Bernard Osuna - Telefutura
Vittorio Parisi - nonsoloboxe.it
Matt Richardson - fightnews.com
Cliff Rold - b*****s*****.com
Michael Rosenthal - ringtv.com
Rick Scharmberg - fightnews.com
Don Steinberg - The Philadelphia Inquirer
Joe Tessitore - ESPN
Paul Upham - Fist/FSN-TV
Claude Vesque - Wikipedia Editor
Calvin Watkins - Dallas Morning News
John Whistler - San Antonio Express News
Phil Woolever - Boxing Digest
Kurt Wolfheimer - fightnews.com

 

hmm says . . .

^^