Pacquiao has been ruining fighters while Mayweather simply outclassing them.......

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NotAnMMAfan, May 20, 2010.


  1. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    8,114
    391
    Sep 2, 2009
    Slick...you are so biased, my man...to say "Pac doesn't hold a candle to Mayweather"...:-( I assume you are either joking, or trying to get under the skin of "*******s"...while I'll be rooting for, and think Pac will win, I'm not gonna say Mayweather isn't on Pac's level. We are talking about 2 guys who could be top 15 ATG before their careers are over...they both deserve respect, and one isn't miles better than the other.
     
  2. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    Honestly, I think he was ruined mentally by both of the beatings he took (Margarito and Pacquaio).
     
  3. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    Cotto is a tough one for me. Because in the fight i thought he fought well. Hit Pac with some big shots i mean you were watching. He had his moments.

    But i will make a better judgement on Cotto after his next fight as coming from 2 beatdown like Margo and Pac could hurt him.

    But i also think Cotto was pretty solid against Clottey before the Pac fight aswell.

    We will see with Cotto who im a fan of.
     
  4. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Yeah I was joking to get it sparked in here, but I do believe that the skill difference is planets apart. I hope Pac mans up and tests so all of you Pac fans can see it.

    Seriously though man... Do you really think Pac could hang with Leonard or Hearns? No way in hell!
     
  5. sauroncuneta

    sauroncuneta Member Full Member

    452
    0
    May 2, 2009
    For the nth time, Pacquiao loses in all fantasy fights (accdg to boxing experts and boxing experts wannabes), so why bother telling you if he will win or not. It's pointless because you will never accept any analysis that involves Manny winning.
     
  6. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    Good points.
     
  7. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    These fighters Floyd is "outclassing" are looking likes bags of **** after getting outclassed. They look pretty ruined to me. Pac's legacy will be one of PEDS, rummaging through Floyd's leftovers and ducking the biggest fight of his career.
     
  8. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010
    Many people agree with his analysis.
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Yep. Don't take my word for it...

    They have Mayweather at #1 P4P. That is why when the odds come out? Mayweather will be heavily favored.

    Liking Pac shouldn't make people not notice all the strange crap he has been pulling. Pac will be fighting Margarito this fall.
     
  10. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010
    Arum would rather steal a dollar than earn $10.
     
  11. dits

    dits Active Member Full Member

    1,011
    0
    Oct 7, 2007
    I'm kinda okay with floyd outclassing pac and pac ruining floyd. hehehe.
     
  12. Odds are already out, actually. Mayweather is a very slight favorite. Go see for yourself:

    http://sports.bodog.com/sports-betting/boxing.jsp
    Floyd -140
    Manny +110

    http://www.sportsbook.com/livesports/indexmember.php?sportsname=boxing
    Floyd -150
    Manny +120
     
  13. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
  14. WelshWizard

    WelshWizard Slap King Full Member

    1,283
    0
    Nov 11, 2008

    You must be on drugs or something or just straight up on Pacquiao nuts. You must think Floyd just fought cab drivers all his life and the three fighters that Pacman fought which is Morales, Barrera, and Marquez is better then all the opponents that Floyd fought before his retirement. You need to do a lot of research before you make such a dumb ass post.
     
  15. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Oscar was also a fossil.

    It makes my skin crawl when floyd huggers act like he deserves credit for marquez because he was #2 p4p. There is a reason we have p4p rankings. Becase we acknowledge that despite extraordinary skill size is too big an advantage for some to overcome. You don't get props for beating the #2 p4p guy if he is jumping 2 weight classes from a weight class where he was already small and not at his best. If Hopkins was to whoop up on pacquiao right now no one would give him props for beating the #1 p4p guy.