Pacquiao has every right to say "no"

Explain to me one thing if Manny has nothing to hide why would he have a problem with Floyd's demands? If he has nothing to worry about why make a big deal about taking the test? IF he has nothing to hide whats the big deal with giving blood?

 

If you've got nothing to hide, one or two extra drug tests aren't any big deal. I think Pac isn't on PEDs and I have always thought he doesn't use them. But I woulnd't be terribly surprised if he does. Pac's refusal to comply raises doubt.

 

It been said by more then a few fighters, that other fighter take roids and the boxing commissions does nothing to improve their stance on keep the sport clean.

I guess shannon briggs size natural ..

 

not gonna b other readin all the responces

ALL I GOTTA SAY IS SHANE MOSELEY

 

Definitely so!

 

Let me translate what your saying. All other boxers like mosely can get past simple blood testing without getting caught. Why should Manny get treated any differently? (a.k.a. why should manny run the risk of getting bust for drgs if it turns out that he is on them if everyone else has theability to get away with it).

p.s. you need to drop this there is no proof arguement. Cause there is no proof until there is a positive test. If the drug testing is better all this does is increase the likelihood that there will be a positive test. It doesn't condem anyone that is inocent.

 

The state of California deserves better than a roid freak governor.

 

Yes, this!

 

what BS!! but its ok to enforce a catch weight at 147, its ok to enforce what gloves should be for pac and his opponents, its ok to request 10million dollar penalty fee for every pond over the weight limit. Pac and his team have controlled the scales, and rules their last 3 fights.

 

id would proby agrree to one but i am not ****in 7 bitches with 1 connie

 

Re: Pacquiao has every right to say "no

What is he on a date?

 

The Mayweathers always had that suspicion even before this issue came up. And you are right, it is just a suspicion since there is really no basis for it. Pac has passed all tests 100% each time in the past, why should he try to disprove a baseless suspicion by following May's whim?

The burden of proof is on the Mays, not on Pac. Pac does have to lift a finger to prove his long-held, tested and proven innocence.

 

So let me get this right Pac really has nothing to hide but he is ducking out of this because of pride? Common man the tests they do aren't 95% accurate they get beat all the time. Which funny enough so does the lie detector test.