Pacquiao: I am the Best Boxer ever (!)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BenjaminLinus, Nov 8, 2010.


  1. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Come on now :lol: Cherry picking from both sides. FACT :deal
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
    I have no problem with Pac saying he's the best ever. What else is he suppose to say when asked that question? No I'm not that good.
     
  3. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Thank you, when Floyd said it I had no problem and when Pacquiao said it, I have no problem. When I train, I go around thinking I'm the best in city or school or what ever. If you're ranked number 1 or 2 p4p, haven't lost since 1994 in the amateurs or haven't lost since 2005 and avenged it twice(even though he was weight drained) then hell yeah think that.
     
  4. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    The guys you speak of are where they are as they largely dominated their era, at their best weight, at their peak.

    Pacquiao was certainly not the obvious best 130 fighter of his era. In fact he came off second best not once but twice to marquez, and never did anything more than that.

    Marquez, as history stands, is probably a better fighter than Pacquiao at their best weight division.

    If SRR came off second best to LaMotta, or Duran never dominated 135 they'd be the same.

    You can't rank anyone top 10 when they not only had equals, but actually had fighters better than them, at their prime
     
  5. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Well to be fair........ He is the best, who can currently beat him? Mayweather but he doesnt want the fight, untill the fight is made Pac is currently the best fighter in the world..
     
  6. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    Paclands response to being labelled as morons who know nothing about boxing, is trying to claim that anyone who's not a huge Pacquiao fan is a "*****".

    Styles do make fights. Why Pacquiao has no chance with mayweather.

    If Floyd was a brawler, it would be 50/50. He aint
     
  7. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    How? Manny made De la Hoya sign rehydration clauses to get the fight?

    Did you hear Manny telling the world he'd forced Oscar to come in 20 pounds underweight?!
     
  8. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    lol no dude, but Pacquiao throws so many punches that at least one has to land right LMAO he landed 246 punches out of 1200 on a human punching bag
     
  9. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    who are pacs favourite fighters actually? does some one know?
     
  10. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    We are all still waiting for you to produce any evidence of that.

    So wheres the evidence?
     
  11. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    There's two middleweights fighting in a couple of weeks that can beat him
     
  12. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    first off....its nothing but an opinion.... a bunch of other people feel Floyd will beat Pac...how is that ridiculous?

    You feel it is a 50/50 fight so be it....although im not saying Floyd has an easy fight I am saying he has the tools to beat Pac in convincing fashion, its not a toss up fight to me...yes either fighter has a chance but thats every fight.....in this fight though, looking at both fighters....Floyd is better than Pac and he has physical advantages.

    You bring up resumes and pac being greater for what? That isnt even what i was talking about yet your so insecure about Pac you gotta keep stating it. It means nothing because bottom line is Floyd is the better boxer...Pac will come in the fight a great fighter no doubt and the greater of the two if that makes you feel better but the end result to me will be a convincing win for Floyd....hence the comment Pac is great Floyd is better!
     
  13. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010
    Mayweather struggled with Oscar as he was not only still pretty good back then, but he was also 168 pounds in ring.

    He was 147 in ring. And by Pacquiao's constant catch weights, and rehydration deals, it's plainly obvious that he wouldn't consider facing any guy with that much weight advantage.

    Hatton was so shot after mayweather, that he pretty much lost to Juan Lazcano on his comeback as well. Nearly got knocked out about 4 times in that fight.

    As for Hatton troubling Floyd? Do you mean losing every single round, not landing a single shot, and getting knocked out?

    Manny has a chance, if you just buy into hype.

    The truth is, Manny struggled with a defensive guy like Josh Clottey. Let alone face someone like Mayweather
     
  14. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Did they come from fly weight too?
     
  15. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    Is this the official Pacland response?

    Ali lost to Norton when he was on the slide. He didn't lose to him when he was at his peak, and ruling the division.

    Pacquiao not only had equals in his era, at his best weight, but they were in fact better than him there.

    If Manny's the best fighter of all time, he don't come out of a fight with a borderline HOFer looking like an amateur