I have no problem with Pac saying he's the best ever. What else is he suppose to say when asked that question? No I'm not that good.
Thank you, when Floyd said it I had no problem and when Pacquiao said it, I have no problem. When I train, I go around thinking I'm the best in city or school or what ever. If you're ranked number 1 or 2 p4p, haven't lost since 1994 in the amateurs or haven't lost since 2005 and avenged it twice(even though he was weight drained) then hell yeah think that.
The guys you speak of are where they are as they largely dominated their era, at their best weight, at their peak. Pacquiao was certainly not the obvious best 130 fighter of his era. In fact he came off second best not once but twice to marquez, and never did anything more than that. Marquez, as history stands, is probably a better fighter than Pacquiao at their best weight division. If SRR came off second best to LaMotta, or Duran never dominated 135 they'd be the same. You can't rank anyone top 10 when they not only had equals, but actually had fighters better than them, at their prime
Well to be fair........ He is the best, who can currently beat him? Mayweather but he doesnt want the fight, untill the fight is made Pac is currently the best fighter in the world..
Paclands response to being labelled as morons who know nothing about boxing, is trying to claim that anyone who's not a huge Pacquiao fan is a "*****". Styles do make fights. Why Pacquiao has no chance with mayweather. If Floyd was a brawler, it would be 50/50. He aint
How? Manny made De la Hoya sign rehydration clauses to get the fight? Did you hear Manny telling the world he'd forced Oscar to come in 20 pounds underweight?!
lol no dude, but Pacquiao throws so many punches that at least one has to land right LMAO he landed 246 punches out of 1200 on a human punching bag
first off....its nothing but an opinion.... a bunch of other people feel Floyd will beat Pac...how is that ridiculous? You feel it is a 50/50 fight so be it....although im not saying Floyd has an easy fight I am saying he has the tools to beat Pac in convincing fashion, its not a toss up fight to me...yes either fighter has a chance but thats every fight.....in this fight though, looking at both fighters....Floyd is better than Pac and he has physical advantages. You bring up resumes and pac being greater for what? That isnt even what i was talking about yet your so insecure about Pac you gotta keep stating it. It means nothing because bottom line is Floyd is the better boxer...Pac will come in the fight a great fighter no doubt and the greater of the two if that makes you feel better but the end result to me will be a convincing win for Floyd....hence the comment Pac is great Floyd is better!
Mayweather struggled with Oscar as he was not only still pretty good back then, but he was also 168 pounds in ring. He was 147 in ring. And by Pacquiao's constant catch weights, and rehydration deals, it's plainly obvious that he wouldn't consider facing any guy with that much weight advantage. Hatton was so shot after mayweather, that he pretty much lost to Juan Lazcano on his comeback as well. Nearly got knocked out about 4 times in that fight. As for Hatton troubling Floyd? Do you mean losing every single round, not landing a single shot, and getting knocked out? Manny has a chance, if you just buy into hype. The truth is, Manny struggled with a defensive guy like Josh Clottey. Let alone face someone like Mayweather
Is this the official Pacland response? Ali lost to Norton when he was on the slide. He didn't lose to him when he was at his peak, and ruling the division. Pacquiao not only had equals in his era, at his best weight, but they were in fact better than him there. If Manny's the best fighter of all time, he don't come out of a fight with a borderline HOFer looking like an amateur