Pacquiao is more Exciting than Tyson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ProfessorLex, Jul 28, 2011.


  1. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    You're a f*cking idiot. Nothing else needs to be said, you're obviously not a boxing fan.
     
  2. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011

    HAHAHAHA! :lol:
     
  3. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    In-fight boxing is not brawling.
     
  4. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    interesting how like of that list- how many died young . shame. what makes a fighter exciting in the ring can somehow be self destructive outside of it.
     
  5. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    So you saying that Pacquiao vs Morales, Pacquiao vs Marquez was a great great fights that it prove Pacquiao is more exciting then Tyson cause Tyson didn't have a fight of the year canidate in his era vs any opponents? :lol::lol::lol: Man STFU! Anybody that is a true boxing fan knows easily that Mike Tyson is clearly the most exciting fighter in his era. Or hell Tyson was exciting when he return from prison and was still scary when he had the ring walk before facing Lewis. If Tyson fought Tua in 96, i bet that fight would have been way more exciting then Pacquiao vs Morales, Pacquiao vs Marquez.
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    come on .. Tyson brought excitement in the first round and throughout the fight. Manny is always expected to go a few rounds. No comparison.
     
  7. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    They are both exciting. The majority will tell you that one of them is more exciting, even though reality shows the other actualy wins the big fights.
     
  8. avenel

    avenel Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,762
    1
    Aug 7, 2009
    tyson tito over pac anyday
     
  9. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Get lost moron.
     
  10. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    :|
     
  11. Green Man

    Green Man Guest

    GTFO with that **** that if you dont pick Tyson you're not a true fan.

    I've probably watched more fights today than your gay ass has in your all life.

    Basing my Pac pick on his better two way action fights is better than your sorry ass basing your pick of Tyson on you being a scared little ***** during Tyson ring entrances and on a fight that didnt happened.
     
  12. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    If people gauge KO power and seeing opponents layed out on the canvas, current Pacquiao can't compare with Tyson. You'd have to watch a younger Pacquiao in the lower weight divisions when Pac was destroying mostly nobodies (just like Tyson did).

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HliNmW06zfc[/ame]
     
  13. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    pure nuthugging and trolling at its best. only few come clsoe to tyson in the exciting department. tyson was a beast in the ring. he came to destroy ya. it was always brutal and pure entertainment. what made him more exciting was his personality. pac is way behind in that department. hes too much of a nice guy.
     
  14. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
  15. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Then clearly you're not a true boxing fan. You talk about Pacquiao being more excited then Tyson cause Pacquiao been on great fights with Morales and Marquez? :lol::lol::lol: That's the worst arguement i ever READ! You're a biased *******. You and that idiot caneman must be twin brothers.