pacquiao lawsuit

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ant, Jan 8, 2010.


  1. ant

    ant Ride The Walrus Full Member

    2,782
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    i was just thinking wouldnt pac have to take the blood test anyway to prove his case because his complaint is that mayweather has nothing to back up his claims but wouldnt he have to have the blood test to have the back up for his innocense?
     
  2. nubianprince

    nubianprince Active Member Full Member

    726
    0
    Dec 16, 2009
    You can only prove clean by staying clean before ,until and after the fight, and see what you do in the fight itself.
     
  3. Silent_Assassin

    Silent_Assassin Lightning Full Member

    1,229
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    yea i think thats why every one has been so quiet because they know that they have put they self in a corner....he wont win tho
     
  4. Spunik

    Spunik Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,967
    2
    Dec 6, 2008
    If Pac agreed to the terms and fought Money....he'd have a pretty much a slam dunk case ....absent a Victor Conte type witness
     
  5. Silent_Assassin

    Silent_Assassin Lightning Full Member

    1,229
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    Yea he's just ****ing himself over
     
  6. ant

    ant Ride The Walrus Full Member

    2,782
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    i dont see what pacs got against drug tests until 14 days before the fight you cant use the excuse that it will drain ye for the fight thats plenty time i just wish it could be sorted out
     
  7. silkyjohnson

    silkyjohnson Active Member Full Member

    898
    0
    Dec 17, 2009
    Personal opinion :deal

    That **** won't hold up in a defamation suit.

    It's just a waste of time really.
     
  8. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,426
    13,997
    Mar 5, 2006
    a defamation suit in Las Vegas? Pac's got this city by the balls. If they throw it out the court, siyanara $ and the big bucks in Las Vegas. Pac will take his show elsewhere.

    Damn right he's got a case and there's more players involved.
     
  9. Top Dog

    Top Dog Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,276
    1
    Oct 10, 2006
    Your joking right:lol: Mayweathers have been ripping Pac a new arsehole on-line, totally slandering him with the talk of steroids etc, his lawyer just needs to provide video evidence of them saying it. Pac dont have to have a blood test to prove he is clean, its up to them to prove he aint:tong
     
  10. Top Dog

    Top Dog Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,276
    1
    Oct 10, 2006
    Dont talk ****. Its like someone going on tv and saying something like "that silent assasin has got to be a paedo, cause he is hung like a mouse" would you have a case? damn right.
     
  11. ant

    ant Ride The Walrus Full Member

    2,782
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    i know this but what im saying is he cant prove it untrue without the test itself
     
  12. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009

    dont think so - I am not law expert but i think all he has to do is prove that the statements were false (and the people who made them knew they were false) and that they hurt his reputation or ability to earn money.
     
  13. ant

    ant Ride The Walrus Full Member

    2,782
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    ok i just though to prove there false...he had to prove they wer fales lol
     
  14. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    No. The burden of proof is on Mayweather to prove that they had evidence when they made the statement. Pac could fail a drug test now and it would not count.
     
  15. If they do make him give blood, they won't make him take it the day before a major fight. That would be the difference.

    I'm sure he'd be more than happy to give them a blood sample; just not in the middle of a training session, or hours before the biggest fight of his career.