Pacquiao looks normal

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sir Koolkid, Feb 29, 2012.


  1. Sir Koolkid

    Sir Koolkid Active Member Full Member

    784
    0
    Feb 13, 2012
    the castillo fight wasn't as bad performance he didn't look bad like pac did vs marquez. Floyd never looked exposed

    Floyd had a competitive few rounds with judah at the start then adjusted and started whooping that ass in dominating fashion all the way to the final bell and you could feel a KO coming before judah threw the low blow on purpose and stopped the fight and took floyd out of his rhythm. Saying floyd struggled with judah is just a big exaggeration.

    I think i should mention floyd was still on the come up vs castillo and since being at the top he has had no problems with any fighter. Someone doing good in one round vs floyd is a big deal these days. We judge him but a whole different scale altogether.

    He looked skillful as ever vs oscar at 154 and like i said he never looked exposed like pacquiao did vs marquez. Big difference in these comparisons.
     
  2. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    I was referring to the thread title, saying Pacquiao looks "normal", its because of styles. Much like Floyd looked "normal" and human in some of his fights.

    Its just natural, the major difference is adaptability and versatility. Floyd may have struggled, but he found a way tactically and technically, to impose his will on his opponents, whereas with Manny Pacquiao you got a guy grinding on the same stone till it breaks, sometimes that stone isn't going to break, like with Marquez.
     
  3. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    :hi:... Every fighter has had a bad night.... Floyd had a bad night with JLC....he had a bad night with Ricky and DLH. Shall I go on?

    And Between PAC and Shane..... You are claiming PAC was the one who had a bad night?:think Interesting. I could have swore Shane had a really bad night and on top of everything else he lost.... he couldn't even quit like he wanted to do.:lol: But yea... I guess everyone thinks it was PAC who had the bad night.

    So you telling me that because PAC has had 2 catch weight, that he's been able to accomplish history, capturing 8 titles in 8 divisions? And he's a news Flash.... Catch weights were not created when Manny faced Cotto at 145 for the WBO Welter weight championship.

    Guys like Leonard, Armstrong, Nard, DLH and yes.....even your boy Floyd have had catch weight fights. And there haven't been many who were able to do the things they've done in this sport.... let alone make history like PAC has.

    PAC dominated DLH and Ricky whom Floyd struggled with. There are many different elements to consider in boxing which prevents you or anyone else to predict the outcome of a fight based on common opponents. Styles make fights. Especially at this level.
     
  4. Sir Koolkid

    Sir Koolkid Active Member Full Member

    784
    0
    Feb 13, 2012
    He KO'd undefeated hatton that was not a bad night:lol:

    he beat oscar who was the biggest draw in the sport and he beat him at his own weight class 154 and he fought in the requirements given to him by oscar such as ring size, gloves, etc and he won and became the new king and he became big draw in the sport, that was defo not a bad night for floyd:lol:

    Pac dominated a washed up oscar and a already beatn hatton who was a broken fighter and both guys retired after the fight they were that finished.

    two of pac's title were not won at the official weight. Floyd hasn't done that he fights at the official weight:nono
     
  5. Sir Koolkid

    Sir Koolkid Active Member Full Member

    784
    0
    Feb 13, 2012
    i don't really think he's normal thats just to get people in to the thread. Nice analysis of the difference between the two. I agree with it.
     
  6. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    He KO'd Ricky after 10 hard rounds... Pac took less than 6 minutes to do what took Floyd over a half an hour.....without any assistance from the turnbuckel.:rofl

    I actually agree with you.... DLH was one of Floyds best wins... Even though Floyd was unable to dominate like most felt he should.....DLH was still a very good fighter and was the bigger man.

    So you are telling me that Floyd ruined DLH based on a split decision win and Ricky based on a 10th round KO?:huh. It's funny how all the sudden guys are shot after they lose to Pac... No one said Ricky was shot...nor did they say DLH was shot before facing Manny.

    Floyd has caught at a catch weight and had JMM been champion at welter weight it would have been for a title. JMM at the time was the Light weight champion and of course Floyd wasn't dropping down to 130 again.
     
  7. Sir Koolkid

    Sir Koolkid Active Member Full Member

    784
    0
    Feb 13, 2012
    I don't know were your from but i'm from the UK and ricky's hometown is one hour and 30 minutes away from me i have been to this city many times. You don't need to live close to hatton's hometown to know this guy was loved fighter in the country he was seen as a beast and one thing i learned which you can't ever get an accurate value of but is priceless is 'confidence' floyd beat hatton pretty solid and i didn't think he was struggling and the KO was just shocking. After that hatton was never the same he lived with that '0' for his whole career and not just till in the range of 20-30 fights were most fighter have an '0' and lose it but ricky had it till over 40 fights. You really think your invincible when you have your '0' for that long and i know even floyd felt the pressure in that fight because his celebration was just more than usual and he cried. '0' mean a lot to a fighter who's had them for so long. Hatton was broken after that fight he looked lackluster vs Lazcano and gave a weak performance it was clear ricky was no longer the same i could say ricky was taking a slight decline before the floyd fight but what floyd did to him broke him. He then fought magic man and beat him nicely which was the plan to give ricky so kind of shine back just before he fought pacquiao. He came in the fight with his hands down, how was he not gone a get KO'd doing that. It real wasn't hard to KO the ricky hatton that came in the ring that night.

    Oscar is a different story. He hadn't fought at 147 in 7 nearly 8 years. He was so weight drained how much credit do YOU want to give pacquiao for this win. I can say i expect oscar to beat him or do this or that but no one expected oscar to look like that and pac might of proven us wrong but that don't change the FACT the version of oscar he fought that night was a corpse. I could list a very long list of fighters who would of beat oscar that night at 147.

    Floyd didn't ruin oscar at all but he beat a MUCH better version of oscar than the one pacquiao fought. Floyd fought him at his best weight and that means something.

    Hatton was criticized heavily after the floyd loss and the weak performance vs Lazcano you just might of not heard. That performance vs Lazcano showed us ricky was done.

    You can not give pacquiao more credit than floyd for beating these guys even if he did stop them because floyd fought a much better version. These guys were so done when pacquiao faced them they retired as i said already.

    I could say look what floyd did to marquez after a 18 months lay off and coming back rusty and dominating the number 2 P4P fighter in the world like he was some tune up fight. He should get a lot of credit even if marquez looked fat and never looked fat vs pacquiao in the trilogy but he was still just as slow in the pac fight as he was when he fought floyd.

    That wins is so underrated but it was beautiful boxing floyd showed he was leagues above marquez.
     
  8. Hitta_Squadup

    Hitta_Squadup Beast ***e Full Member

    3,413
    1
    Oct 31, 2009
    Manny Pacquiao has not, I repeat has not lost a step, this is just an excuse used by Manny, his team and his fans for not so dominant performances, in his fight with Shane Manny was still fast, still threw punches in combinations and barely got hit, he even dropped Mosley, after that knockdown Shane became even more defensive and would not engage only throwing jabs because he was afraid to be countered, Shane even admitted he was afraid of Pacs punches, hard to be dominant against a guy who doesn't want to fight...

    Let's go back to Manny's fight with Clottey who fought similar to Shane Mosley, Joshua only played defense in fear of being countered, we all know Clottey has a solid defense and its hard to look spectacular against a guy with very good defense who doesn't want to throw punches, Pac was still very fast, high workrate and threw in combinations, after that fight Pac dominated Tony Margarito where fans and boxing experts claimed Pac looked sensational even breaking Margos orbital bone...

    Now the dumbest example of Manny slowing down is his fight with JMM, even a younger Pac struggled and arguably lost to Marquez even only coming away with a draw after multiple knockdowns, now in the third fight where Manny was supposed to dominate and ko the "smaller" Marquez, Pac barely scrapped by "again" and arguably lost to a man who is a very skilled fighter and apparently has Pacs number, Pac still looked fast as ever, threw in combinations and his footwork even looked great, unfortunately for Pac Marquez is on the same level as Pac and that's why he didn't dominate...

    Had Manny Ko'ed Marquez in a few rounds no one would say he has slowed down, any true knowledgeable boxing fan knows that boxing effectively, good defense and good counter punching ability will always give Pac troubles doesn't mean he's slowed down, he beat Clottey and Mosley 120-108 & 120-107 respectfully, why because they didn't come to fight and scores like that spells domination, expectations are high for Manny and if he doesn't destroy his opponents its "hes declined" bull**** I call...

    Anyone who disputes this, show footage dissecting how Manny is declining I'll wait, but I know there is no such evidence...
     
  9. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Not from the UK.... I'm from Baltimore. But it's well known that Ricky had the most loyal following of any sports figure in the last decade. The fight between Floyd and Ricky was one where Ricky fought his fight but still lost. But he made it a very hard fight for Floyd and that's not just my take on it.... that words that came straight out of Floyd own mouth. So that has to be taken with more than just a grain of salt.

    After that fight Ricky was even MORE confident that he was able to compete with Floyd. Sure... he lost by KO but it wasn't an easy night for Floyd and Floyd himself validated that so even with the Loss Ricky's confidence was at an all time high.

    The "0" does give confidence for the undefeated fighters.... but loses sometimes acts a a shot of adrenaline that pushes a fighter to get better or improve in their craft. Usually the great fighters or the champions are the ones who come back better after a loss.

    Do you remember how Hatton looked at his only fight at 147 before facing Floyd? He faced Luis Callozo. That was an indication that Ricky's BEST weight was Jr. WW where he was undefeated. Hatton is arguably 0-2 at 147. When he had the fight with Paulie and Lazcano he was getting back into the Jr WW division where he actually ruled with an iron fist... he's one of the more dominant Jr WW champions the division has ever produced. We can't say that Ricky was ever a dominant force at 147.

    Ricky got blasted by PAC because PAC was a better fighter with a style that was going to cause him fits. His defense was good up until he got caught...afterall he had Floyd Sr has his head trainer who is all about the Defensive game. Ricky was suppose to be better defensively with the addition of Floyd Sr. It just didn't work out that way.

    For the DLH fight I give PAC all the credit in the world. He was the smaller man coming up not one but TWO division where DLH was only coming down 3 lbs from his previous fight that was at a catch weight of 151 against forbes... in a fight where he completely dominated.

    DLH wasn't the PRIME DLH who beat out boxed Tito and KO'd Vargas but he was the HUGE favoriate and NO one gave PAC any chance at winning. I don't buy anyones excuse that he was weight drained because Nacho dismissed all of that even after the fight was done and over with.

    PAC beat a DLH who lost by a SD to the P4P king at the time... Floyd Jr. And PAC did so in FAAAAR more dominant fashion than Floyd.

    DLH was a better version but Ricky was not. And I give BOTH men credit for their wins... however... PAC was more dominant in 2 fights with Common opponents (Ricky and Oscar).. Floyd was only dominant in one fight with a common opponent (JMM).

    We'll see how Floyd does with Cotto... Now... are you going to say that Cotto is shot? After all he took a beating at the hands of Manny.

    Floyd was coming off a long lay off to fight JMM... again.. a light weight champion... not a WW champion. It was also JMM's first time moving up to 147. It was a good win for Floyd but not a great one.... they way he dominated was more impressive than facing JMM at 144 even though Floyd came in heavy at 146.

    Floyd is not leagues above Marquez..... Maybe at 147 but not overall. JMM is a proven great.
     
  10. Sir Koolkid

    Sir Koolkid Active Member Full Member

    784
    0
    Feb 13, 2012
    Floyd often praises his opponents before and after he beats them. He's praising cotto hardcore right now just like he normally does with his opponents. Floyd had more trouble with oscar than he did with hatton. Floyd doesn't even KO a lot of guys yet you chose the hatton fight to call hard for him:lol: and im a floyd fan but even i don't take everything floyd say's serious. Even i heard him say pacquiao was gone a be his next opponent when doing the ortiz press tour then in another interview i heard him back pedal and say he never said that. Since one does anyone treat the things floyd say's like gospel. If floyd gives hatton credit as a fighter it only gives him props for beating him, what good would it be to not credit hatton.

    I was reading your post and once i got to were you wrote "even when ricky lost to floyd his confidence was at an all time high" i stopped there. You don't know what your talking about. This debate is over.
     
  11. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    :rofl

    No he's not, for example.. Mosley he completely trashed and said "Vernon Forrest, ****ED YOU UP, Winky Wright, ****ED YOU UP, Miguel Cotto, ****ED YOU UP... Floyd Mayweather... I'm gonna **** you up some more!"

    :lol:

    Floyd has a very nasty side to him when it comes down to it, and its probably what makes him such a beast and genius inside/outside the ring.
     
  12. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010

    Pacquiao struggled against Mosley ?:patsch
     
  13. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Floyd does often praise his opponents after he fights them.... but he's not one to say he's had a difficult fight for ANYONE. DLH had a more "tactical" and strategically challenging fight with Floyd than Floyd had with Ricky.... which was a more "Physically taxing" and grueling fight than Floyd is use to. Floyd has never really liked Oscar so I think giving him props is out of the question.

    I don't take EVERYTHING Floyd says seriously.... just when he seems sincere.... YES... there are time when Floyd is or at least seems to be sincere.:yep

    If Floyd had a of dominated Hatton like everyone expected then we wouldn't have heard Floyd saying Ricky was a tough or his "toughest" fight. He would have did what he did with JMM.... say he's a great fighter and "i can't take nothing away from him":lol:. Floyd is pretty predictable on a lot of things especially when it comes to what he might say.

    If you stopped reading after me telling you that Ricky's confidence was at a high for how WELL he did against the best P4P boxer on the planet then that's your loss.

    Ricky's confidence was SHATTER after his 2nd round destruction at the hands of PAC... not the 10 round KO loss to Floyd where he actually won some rounds and made it a longer fight than anyone expected.

    No one gave Ricky a chance against Floyd.... .but there were MANY who thought Ricky would destroy PAC... ESPECIALLY at 140 where Ricky was undefeated.

    The debate has been over since I went in on you.:hey I'm just doing kicking a little extra knowledge since I have the forum to do so.
     
  14. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Just Great, another ****ing annoying *****.
     
  15. Sir Koolkid

    Sir Koolkid Active Member Full Member

    784
    0
    Feb 13, 2012
    him and mosley hated each other they had bad history shane rushed the ring after floyd beat marquez and was having a interview, floyd was fuming about that. Plus mosley was talking nuff sh!t to get the fight but floyd was the one who wanted the when he was coming up and mosley was the one with the big name and ducked him. He can be nasty tho but who can't he praises his opponents more than degrades them.