The fact you assume I believe PAC has tried to make this fight after my last post shows your stupidity. I don't believe either of what they've said, floyd said he tried to make the fight, you believe him. PAC says he tried to make the fight, you don't believe him. I don't believe EITHER of them. Where you got the assumption that I think PAC tried to make the fight I don't know, maybe it's the fact that you think anyone who doesn't hang on floyds every word must be a PAC nut hugger. I'm neutral in the situation unlike you *****s and *******s.
Ali: "would my fans pay for my hospital bills?" Actually, floyd has a point so he has to fight mostly less riskier opponents.
It is a valid insinuation in some instances... If Kubrat Pulev were questioned to fight David Price by a reporter, it would be fair, accurate, and understandable for him to say that "Price has Tony Thompson problems." Ideally the proposed opponent doesn't have recent weaknesses or bad showcases to point at. The whole point is to face the best opponents. Who wants to face a guy who isn't at the best they can realistically/legally be?
And for the record, Morales doesn't have Barrera problems anymore. We are too far removed from that. No. Erik Morales has drug testing problems... Many say it will or should keep him out of the Hall of Fame.