Pacquiao Now considered ATG!! The only question is where he Ranks!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PacDbest, Jul 3, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dynasty091

    Dynasty091 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,633
    0
    Jul 2, 2008
    Instead of assuming that Pac will beat Hatton, Mayweather, or etc. how about we just worry about Pac's potential fight with Edwin Valero first?
     
  2. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Pacdbest is the funniest poster on this forum bar none. In a good way. Just check out his name and his avatar lol. Hilarious. Hell I actually think its Pacman posting on this forum for real.
     
  3. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    Bert Sugar is the ****.

    Pac was already an ATG, but he's steadily rising.. Defeating Hatton and unifying the 135lb division could possibly land him in the top 10.. He's only 29, he's in his prime, and he can still achieve and accomplish more than he has already..

    And enough with this "he beats over the hill mexicans" ****.. That's the only excuse or way for people to try to discredit him.. For the "haters", give the guy a break and actually give a hand for the guy.. You're not gonna' see another fighter like this for a long time when he's gone..
     
  4. Joe Jeanette

    Joe Jeanette Member Full Member

    230
    0
    Mar 15, 2008
    this whole post is just inaccurate.
     
  5. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    91
    Dec 26, 2007
    Well outside of the top 50 for certain. But at this point he's inside the top 100, not sure where in between there.
     
  6. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    Who do you think are kidding?

    1- You dislike Mijares.
    2- You wanted Hatton to beat PBF, so Pac could take over the P4P# 1
    3- You forgot also to say that you enjoyed the way Guzman defeated Soto.

    PacD, you don't need to try so hard to convince us.....we believe you.:roll:
     
  7. aillmatic

    aillmatic Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,710
    0
    Jul 28, 2007
    why do we keep feeding this guy... this thread should have never reached to 5 pages.
     
  8. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    :rofl

    I don't even know whose write-up is sillier.. delusional PacDBest's or that idiot Bert Sugar's. Any "boxing expert" who was that impressed (or impressed period) by Pac's performance against Diaz shouldn't be allowed to call themselves a boxing expert. I finally got to watch this fight today and Pac did what he was supposed to do, he destroyed a fighter at least 3-4 levels below him. If anything, Pac should be considered worse now at 135.. because his power didn't carry up as well as it possibly could have. It's not a fact yet, but Diaz's chin is far from iron and Pac needed to severely punish him for 9 rounds before taking him out.

    Anyways, I'm off again. Getting a little bit of internet access here and the first thread I wanted to see after watching the fight was this one. :lol: It's ridiculous how the boxing media talks about this victory like it's something more than a barely B- level fighter getting destroyed by an elite one. Who cares if Diaz had a belt? The win shouldn't be counted much more than the win against Solis was.
     
  9. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    yeah, i shouldn't even have posted here..i'll stop here. top 10 ATG:patsch
     
  10. chino2dapiapimp

    chino2dapiapimp WBC Fecarbox champ Full Member

    1,814
    86
    Jun 30, 2008
    Dude Morales Chin is on the same level as the best of them. He never went down up until Pac(dont count the MAB first fight). I think his knockdowns came from fatigue in the 2nd fight, but 3rd fight they were legitimate.
     
  11. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    thats the thread title.. if you have him in top 10 already then it shouldn't be a question for you
     
  12. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    Are you serious with your comment? Pac will worry with Valero?
    Pac does not worry. He's not the tpye who worries. He trains like hell in the gym. If Valero loves his "0" Loss I guess it's Valero who should worry?! Not the other way around.

    Welcome to the club newbie!
     
  13. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    When you *******s learn how to read, then the world will be better around ESB.

    He didn't say that Pac is worried or should be worried about Valero. He did suggest that we as posters should worry first for the Pac Vs Valero (potential fight). What he probably meant was we should discuss first the fight between Pac and Valero. Comprende?
     
  14. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    It's the persons who claims that mab is over the hill when they first met who look ridiculous. They are saying those stuff to take out the credit from pac..

    open you eyes.. all the pac haters claim that his fights are from nobody's... some even claim he is just lucky?!

    DAMN! I never new that being lucky has something to do with#2 and now #1 p4p.

    Did you ever noticed that pac haters never gave him due credit?!

    Since pac last lost to Morales. Pac is on a roll. Eight wins + a contraversial draw (that's another topic)

    Some haters still does not give credit and yet he was #2 p4p and now #1 (since pbf retired).. and yet NO F_CK_ng! Credit?!

    For a change.. OPEN your eyes..:good
     
  15. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    Yeah you are correct professor! Anyway, my comment remain true and it's addressed to valero and his fans!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.