Pacquiao or Sanchez...Which set of wins is more impressive?

Did you read everything I posted??? Laporte & Nelson was an unknown guys going into the fight. they're both inexperienced. Gomez is the smaller guy. how many times I have to repeat it!!!

Skillwise, just watch all the videos. Compare it to the skills of JMM, EM & MAB. I pick the recent 3 Mex legends. This era is the best Featherweight bunch in History. Isn't it enough gauge????

 

Unknown=Popularity.

I asked you about their skills and what they were viewed as as BOXERS not entertainers and PPV numbers. Why is it you can't respond to the question asked?

I don't need to watch the video's shortbus. I know what they look like. I am asking you to describe them to prove a point. YOU have never seen the fighters, yet you are making judgements on them. It's the very reason you can't answer my questions and keep referring to their popularity. You are calling them this and that based on their records. Mayweather was inexperienced when he beat Hernandez. Jones was inexperienced when he beat Hopkins. DLH was really inexperienced when he won his first title. The numbers don't tell you everything. Nelson, inexperienced, dynamite fighter. Lopez? Old, and could punch like a mule kicks. But you have never seen them, so you can't make any actual judgements.

As for this FW era? In their primes, yes perhaps as a whole. It's debatable really. The 80's would get the nod in most polls. But they weren't all prime when Pacquaio got to them.

 

Is that facts??? get me some real facts!!!!

 

You want all the facts? Or just the ones that make your story stand up?

Facts need context. Learn it, live it, love it.

 

What does skills or style has to do with this Debate??? I already laid out the facts. Pac has more impressive win against a better opposition!!!!

 

I've always loved the way Sanchez fought:yep

Manny's not done yet and though I think his ceiling will be 135? It's never over til the fat lady sings and never say never I suppose? I will say its UNLIKELY.

 

I'm here to show facts & only the truth. I'm not gonna twist it anymore just like you guys are doing. Sleep time now for me. Ok students read more about Boxing History!!! Ask Granpa & compare Today's fighter & from the 80s. Then come back here & contribute!!!!

 

Stop dodging my question. Have you seen these fighters fight extensively or NOT PacD.

Facts need context, something you seem more than willing to provide if it HELPS you. You provide positive context for Pacquiao's foes.

IE. MAB was ranked #3 P4P. (How about, MAB had been in the ring for 14 years using a brutal style. One that has retired many Mexican fighters in their early 30's)

Morales was ranked P4P. (He also was in the ring for 14yrs, AND lost 5 of his last 6 fights)

See, those are facts too. You just leave out what you like.

 

Right....you never twist facts in Pacquiao's favor.

2 times now you have left this thread and never once answered my post or questions. I think I have sufficiently proved my point.

Perhaps you should try WATCHING the fighters lol....not reading Wikipedia.

 

Sanchez :yep

 

Did you answer my simple question??? Where did you get your info about this 80s fighter??? Where did you see this fighter fights???