Pacquiao or Sanchez...Which set of wins is more impressive?

A combination of beating Guzman(decisively) and beating Diaz, Casamayor and Campbell would be pretty serious.

Except for the fact that Campbell kills him, Guzman schools him, Casa's a 50/50 and Diaz is picked just for an easy win.

 

well thanks.

 

Here's Chava's record. Check also the record of his opponent listed above, How they are perceived going into the fight.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=2201&cat=boxer

Gomez- he's moving up in weight, Chava's naturally bigger. Same as Rafa vs Izzy, Pac vs MAB, Pac vs EM.

Nelson- Last minute replacement, in-experienced. Who's in Nelson's resume going into the fight??? Nobody!!!

Lopez -already has some KO loses to Chacon & some Japanese bum.

Castillo- Recently Koed by Arguello

La porte- just look his record before & after Chava. He's no HOF.

Cowdell- Who did he beat??? And Chava just won by SD.

Pac's Resume is fresh from your mind- No need to explain how Greater his wins are. Forget about the Larios fight, it's just a tune-up fight.

 

The classic enthusiasts would disagree with you because of not rating Campbell or Guzman as anything.:yep

 

Salvador Sanchez

 

good post. i am waiting for someone to explain in detail why they picked sanchez or pac.

some points. imo morales was not shot in any of the three fights. you could argue the third but it was more mainly to weight problem. pac did stopped barrera. it was an old barrera but a little closer to a prime barrera and an improved version of his prime years. the manner of when the fights took place and condition must be given importance. who was the reigning champion? who was going up in weight? the quality and variety of styles that each faced.

 

Only nuthuggers believe Morales was not shot in that 3rd fight. IT WAS OBVIOUS for those watching without pacman eyes.

I was rooting for Morales and after round 1 I knew it was gonna be over soon.

 

Are you blind or just Plain biased???

Pac moving up in weight TKOing a top 5 P4P in MAB. There's nothing on Chava's resume with that matches that. This is greater than Chave winning against A SMALLER Gomez.

Pac the only one who Koed Morales & he did it twice. That's the importance of that fight.

Pac's the 1st elite fighter to Fight JMM, and he never played hard to get fighting an avoided fighter like JMM. He was robbed by the judge the 1st time, He won a close one on the rematch. Chava has some SD win too against a not so Great Opponent. JMM is one of the best technical fighter in boxing history. Pac winning twice in my book is a Great accomplishment in itself.

Pac's winning the lineal 112 title against sasakul is Great in itself . Pac's was just 19 & still raw & win in shear natural talent. It's just Like Nelson who's green Knocking out Chava for the title.

The ledwaba fight becomes Great win coz is took Pac only 2 weeks to prepare & the way he demolished a very Good technical fighter.

I told you forget about larios. It's just a tune up.

 

morales' weight problem was properly covered during that time. its easy to say in hindsight that morales was shot but before the fight a lot of morales backers are confident that morales can bat pac again and him getting on a weight control program could fix his weight problem.

 

I would like to add that sanchez was younger than azuma and gomez (azuma was never koed after sanchez fight), also there were some possible matches for salvador Alexis Arguello and Julio Cesar Chavez at 130 that if he would had beaten I have no doubt he would be concidered in the Top 10 boxers in all history.

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl