Pacquiao or Sanchez...Which set of wins is more impressive?

Pacquiao again

 

Pacquiao vs. Marquez fight in the first round should have been stop after the third knockdown.

 

I still say both. We can't/shouldn't compare these guys. They fought different opposition and no way telling what would be the difference.

 

Well I would say based on two facts I would have to say Sanchez.

Reason 1 Sanchez beat fighters in thier primes.

Reason 2 Sanchez actually won those fights:good

 

Sanchez beating Gomez...That was godly.

 

Tell us a little bit about Gomez and LaPorte PacD? Also elaborate on the career of Lopez....

 

Yes, but MOST believed he was shot. He was considered past it a bit when he fought MAB the 3rd time, and others had mentioned his slowing down. This wasn't in hindsight, as it was noticable that it WASN'T the weight because he was unsucessful just 5lbs higher. His body had broken down....He lost 5 of his last 6 fights. That is the very definition of a shot fighter.

 

He is going to have to get back to you on that one. He needs to check box r e c . com first.:hey

 

Remeber it was after Erik was outclassed by Raheem that everyone was saying that he was shot...It was after that when Pac won a fight with Erik..Before Erik won the first fight. I think that only a truely BLIND Pacbacker would say that Erik wasnt shot.

 

And it wasn't that he lost to Raheem....he was outclassed!

He was having trouble making 130 supposedly, so he moves up to 135 and is sluggish and gets beaten easily by an above average fighter with no power.

He moves back down to 130 and is still sluggish and gets KO'd. If you can't make either weight class and you're reflexes are gone, it means your body has broken down.

 

check my previous post.

 

No. You posted a boxrec link. Anyone can do that and it tells you little.

Tell me about their careers, highlights, how they were perceived. You're post on Pacquaio's opponents, you keep referring to how the fighters weres perceived and the context the fight happened in. If you are going to compare objectively (as you claim to be doing) you will be able to tell us some of the context around those 3 fighters, and how they were perceived. So, tell me about them.

 

KG I'm older than you. I was a young teenager when this guys fought. I don't think you're even born when this guys were the stars. I've seen them live on delayed telecast. All the information about them is well documented in the net. Boxrec can't lie. It's well documented. Check wiki too.

 

Yes, and my father is older than me. I can talk circles around him in a sports debate. Age has little to do with this as you well know, otherwise you would never debate with older members. I have seen more boxing than you (you missed at least 13 years worth even if you're not lying about the 80's and you're watching the fighters then)

I never said boxrec lied, I simply said it doesn't tell you everything, especially context. You elaborated on the context of Pacquiao's opponents. I am asking you, in fairness, to do so as well with Sanchez's for the sake of objectivity, something you brought up when questioning Brooklyn.

Now are you going to actually answer the question or not? I am not asking you to elaborte because I don't know, but because I know that YOU don't know. Which is why you are dodging the question. I also think you're lying about seeing them. Now stop stalling.