Pacquiao suing Malignaggi is a must.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jtgilter, Dec 31, 2009.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jtgilter

    jtgilter New Member Full Member

    44
    0
    Dec 1, 2007
    I think pacquiao should file a libel case against Malignaggi above all because he is openly and seriously accusing him of using steriods or PED. I would understand why Team Mayweather will do some trash talking because he has a supposed fight with Manny but Malignaggi has no business with pacquaio after all. I would love seeing Malignaggi loosing the case and begging Pacquiao to forgive him. That guy needs some humbling experience.:happy
     
  2. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    Pac should get him in the ring, saditically beat him, ease up when he's about to go down for the whole 12 rounds.
     
  3. Fighting Pride

    Fighting Pride Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,538
    1
    Feb 12, 2009
    No, accusing Pac of roiding is just Malignaggi "Keeping It Real"
     
  4. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    If that is the case....then he should issue a libel suit against the mayweather's, cintron, malignaggi, mosley has hinted, and now cotto has joined the ranks of those skpetical of manny pacquiao....

    http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html
    Why Commencing A Defamation Action Is Not Aways A Good Idea

    While people who are targeted by lies may well be angry enough to file a lawsuit, there are some very good reasons why actions for defamation may not be a good idea.
    The publicity that results from a defamation lawsuit can create a greater audience for the false statements than they previously enjoyed. For example, if a newspaper or news show picks up the story of the lawsuit, false accusations that were previously known to only a small number of people may suddenly become known to the entire community, nation, or even to the world. As the media is much more apt to cover a lawsuit than to cover its ultimate resolution, the net effect may be that large numbers of people hear the false allegations, but never learn how the litigation was resolved.
    Another big issue is that defamation cases tend to be difficult to win, and damage awards tend to be small. As a result, it is unusual for attorneys to be willing to take defamation cases on a contingent fee basis, and the fees expended in litigating even a successful defamation action can exceed the total recovery.
    Another significant concern is that, even where the statements made by the defendant are entirely false, it may not be possible for a plaintiff to prove all of the elements of defamation. Most people will respond to news that a plaintiff lost a defamation lawsuit by concluding that the allegations were true.
    In other words, the plaintiff in a defamation action may be required to expend a considerable amount of money to bring the action, may experience significant negative publicity which repeats the false accusations, and if unsuccessful in the litigation may cement into the public consciousness the belief that the defamatory accusations were true. While many plaintiffs will be able to successfully prosecute defamation actions, the possible downside should be considered when deciding whether or not such litigation should be attempted.
     
  5. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wishful thinking from the Void fans.
     
  6. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    "What's my name, chump? What's my name?"
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.