Pacquiao to have pick of four: Bradley, Cotto, Marquez or Peterson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vitor Belfort, Jan 4, 2012.


  1. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    Khan will be the betting favorite in the rematch. Having it in Vegas, L.A, Bolton, or anywhere else, won't change it. :)
     
  2. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Pac moving down to 140 isnt that bad actually, fighting peterson and take his two belts, then have bradley fight morales winner faces pac/peterson for 140 supremacy.
    I dont mind marquez 4 but its pointless it will go like the first 3, it would look like a dick move top fight jmm at 144 then move to 140 though.
    Maybe he should do that 140 route and then fight floyd and rios and retire.
     
  3. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Yeah bob arum is really gonna do that. Open your eyes. :lol:
     
  4. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    :rofl

    who said anything about fighting peterson @ 140?


    he needs to not fight a LW or JrWW...if he drags another guy up to WW from a lower class after his shitty JMM theft, it won't help his cherry picking rep....and if he drops to JrWW to fight a JrWW, it will make the fact he fought JMM at 144 look shitty...stop playing the weight games
     
  5. Go Getta

    Go Getta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,444
    0
    Sep 9, 2011
    True, even so I still think Khan done enough to win, anyway yes Khan needs to make adjustments for sure, I think he will and win a UD in the come back fight.
     
  6. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,907
    3,240
    Apr 26, 2010
    What does the city and ref have to do with Peterson getting inside and beating the **** out of Khan, Khan having no inside fighting game, and running like a ***** at the first sign of adversity? Not following you here...
     
  7. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,907
    3,240
    Apr 26, 2010
    :huh, the **** does this even mean? You are one of the corniest ****ers I've ever come in contact with, it's gross how lame and shitty your "humor" is.
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    dude the video you posted proves my point, not yours.

    He didn't say it was out of the question.
     
  9. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    u remove the politricks from pacs fights...and he has far less wins. ppl who know boxing know that jmm should have won the last two fights.

    tim is going to beat pac. i'm willing to place money on that. lamont will make pac look bad too. those guys have real skill and won't be minimized by the weight drain game that pac has been playing.

    miguel didn't have a real trainer in their first fight. with the cuban in his corner expect to see pac get beat pretty bad.
     
  10. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Hmm.... interesting.:think So you're saying......PAC's political connections or his standing within the world of politics somehow has provided him gurantee wins....even going as far to say that some fights were fixed?:?

    I'm not surprised....there's a lot of warped or skewed perception of PAC and his career that a small group of detractors have a hard time wrapping their heads around.... It's so bad that I've seen conspiracy theorist threads on Manny.

    I know boxing inside and out....I've been around it for years and have a true passion for it. People who REALLY know boxing are split when it comes to PAC vs JMM. Some have PAC winning all 3...some have JMM. I have PAC winning TWO out of the Three fights. JMM I believe did enough to get him the nod in the rubber match but it was as close as the previous two.

    Unfortunately Tim isn't on PAC's level....he's not on JMM's either.... Tim is on Khan's level.. He should stick to facing someone he has a chance at beating instead of biting off far more than he can chew by facing the ELITE level guys like JMM, PAC or Floyd. Tim is chasing money...he knows he can't beat those guys I rallied off...That's why he ducked Kahn....he lacked the confidence in beating Amir...he doesn't have the confidence to beat someone like PAC.

    PAC hasn't drained anyone.. That's always a pretty lame excuse that those who don't like PAC come up with to discredit his wins. But whenever you ask PAC's opponents if they were drained they all say they were not. DLH revealed that he was drained but that was dismissed by his trianer who said DLH was in great shape....PAC was just a better fighter.
     
  11. Heavy Handed

    Heavy Handed I keep planets in orbit Full Member

    3,461
    12
    Sep 16, 2011
    DLH weighed the same on fight night as the weigh in. :blood But no, he wasn't drained and in great shape. Those IV needle marks he needed to get nutirents back in his system was just for fun.
     
  12. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Roach claims the scales were off during the official weigh in. Pac was about 4? pounds under what he thought he was and when he re-reweighed back at the hotel those 4? pounds were suddenly back.