Pacquiao vs Bradley II - Technical ****ysis - Pacquiao's Adjustments

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by victor879, Feb 25, 2015.


  1. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Exactly. Bradley Thought he had power or something.
     
  2. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,911
    4
    Aug 12, 2010
    At the end of the third or fourth he complained that he pulled a muscle and he couldn't move. Perhaps that's why he started slugging it out....?
     
  3. killerD

    killerD Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,694
    0
    Nov 7, 2013
    lol at the censorship.
     
  4. RememberingC.S.

    RememberingC.S. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,493
    89
    Oct 9, 2012
    Bradley threw the second fight. He was winning, but they had to rebuild Manny's career, since even after a (bogus) win over Paquaio, Bradley's ones still didn't take off. So in the rematch they had to give the victory to Paquiao no matter what.

    Bradley was winning in the first rounds, and even hurting Paquiao. So he decided to play it dumb, and went full re**** to make a show and be more believable than suddenly stopping throwing punches De la hoya-style.
     
  5. The_Hawk_2

    The_Hawk_2 Lineal WW Champion Full Member

    244
    0
    Feb 19, 2015
    I 've always liked how Pac usually improves after his losses.
     
  6. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Wrong. Speed and chin are both debatable :deal
     
  7. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    I think Pac has slightly better hand speed, much better foot speed. The difference is how they use it so it can be deceptive. The chin is definitely debatable.
     
  8. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    pac has taken far more flush hard shots in his career than duckweather and bear in mind he has been fighting been ultra offensive the shots he has taken in the past 20 years its miracle he has only been down to the head once and that shot was a freak one were he lunged into the shot
     
  9. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Punctuation :deal

    #noexcuses
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,181
    Jun 23, 2005
    Bradley was doing well when he was boxing Pac but then starting to load up and look for the KO. Bradley fought a dumb fight and could have won if he boxed. Bradley is a dumb fighter and fights other people's fights too much.
     
  11. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    troll..........

    pac out manned Bradley simple as that even his coach admitted Bradley got ducked why do you think Bradley fought like that?
    because he knew that he cant beat pac in any way just look at the first fight he was fighting his fight and pac dominated his ass worse
     
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,181
    Jun 23, 2005
    Let me guess you picked Bradley to beat Pac to? Just like you picked PBF to beat pac.
     
  13. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    Yes I did I just placed a mere vote for Bradley just so I can enjoy the victory more when pac beat him and he did beat him good:yep
     
  14. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Are you sure you're a Pacquiao fan? Whether you realize it or not, you just dissed his boxing IQ.

    Watch the video. Pacquiao was "out smarting" Bradley a lot. Not "out manning" him. But hey, if you want to say Pacquiao isn't smart, and just goes in there to "out man his opponent," fine. LOL

    Stupid comment from an obvious Johnny-Come-Lately to the Pacquiao Party. Did you even know who Pacquiao was when he was fighting at 130 pounds and below? Serious question. :lol: