Pacquiao vs Cotto or Mayweather vs Gatti????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BrooklynMumin, Dec 7, 2010.


  1. horst

    horst Guest

    Corrales was a very courageous and very exciting fighter for sure, but for ability I go with Cotto every time. I just think he had better skills, was more well-rounded, and on his best night he was a more effective fighter.


    FYI, if Corrales really is "your man" etc, you should probably realize that he only beat Casamayor once, Casa beat him twice. :oops::oops::oops:
     
  2. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    i think cotto was slightly the better fighter so i'd have to say pac v cotto was more impressive. i think gatti was a good win for floyd at the time cos people wanted to see the fight and gatti was a LWW champion and a warrior, but looking back now i would have to say gatti was made for floyd. cant blame floyd for having the tools he has though. May v Gatti is my favourite but pac vs cotto is the more impressive of the two :good
     
  3. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    :lol: tribute.

    I'm just saying we don't have to put one fighter down to lift another up. And issues like these get spun easily. Corrales deserves more respect then that. This is a man who unified to be linear Champ at 135. Cotto has never been linear champ of anything. Cotto has always been a titlist.
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    Hypocrite much?! :think:lol:
     
  5. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    :lol: did it feel good to point that out? out of all the valid points...

    Well Cotto was never effective enough to be a Champion at 140 or 147. Corrales was at 135.
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    I don't really understand how someone can go around saying "Corrales is my man", and acting all offended at anyone saying they preferred another fighter's ability, when you don't even know who he beat and who beat him. Some fan you are! :lol::patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  7. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    That's a fact not putting him down. Now if I said Corrales is better then Cotto ever was. That would be a hypocrite. I just stated a fact. You are the one who said they are not in the same league.
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    I don't think they are. :good
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    haha, you're assuming I'm black right. My parents are happily married dumbass. I bet I can guess your race *******
     
  10. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    talk about petty. Is that all you hang on to? they had a trilogy and I list one wrong fight get over it. And I had the chance to talk with Corrales he was a very down to earth person.
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    You think his lovely personality would have led to you actually watching his major fights!! :patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  12. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    2
    Aug 14, 2009
  13. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    That's fine. Just know the history of the fighter your talking about. Look at how he did things that Cotto with all his ability couldn't. Then can you make that statement using logic or just your feeling?

    PBF looks to be more effective and have a better range of things he can do in the ring. But Pac is putting in that work and doing it. Corrales already put that work in the history books.
     
  14. horst

    horst Guest


    Hypocrite Getting Owned, Part Two:


    :smoke
     
  15. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    You still stuck on that b/c you have nothing else. greatest fight of all time. linear champ. Heart of a lion. But you still stuck on that one issue b/c that's all you really have. children.