Pacquiao vs Hatton 140 who wins?

you better save your energy dumby. i bet you are so scared right now that if pac whoops hatton, pacdbest will be your daddy forever

pac has nothing to lose but everything to gain in this fight

 

Hatton Would Destroy Pac Man In 4. Hattons A Warrior With A Point To Prove

 

I doubt Pac will see it that way, when he's pissing blood from those bodyshots

It's his delusional fans that have everything to lose, mainly their credibility for making such a damn awful pick

 

what's the difference between excuses and facts?
it is different my fruitcake. i can see clearly the difference of evidence that i can see or just pure imagination. Shot is a hypothetical statement. you can just say shot so that you can save your stupidity. but i can say head butt, busted left hand , blisters because I could see them in actuality. so who's argument is stupid. you know the answer

 

am telling you pac has no business at 140 and he'll be killed. but money drives pac towards hatton. stupid handlers.

 

kg208,

Be realistic! Am I suppose to be some sort of referree or an editor for the pacfans! They are FANS! If you don't like what you hear you comment correct?! If I don't agree with what they are saying or on their opnion am I SUPPOSE TO SCOLD THEM OR STOP THEM?

Be REALISTIC! The type of fans you are saying are true to all boxers!
we have the JMM fans who always claim they were ROBBED when their boxer lose? why did you not comment when I wrote that JMM was ROBBED three times already according to the fans?!

You see. This is what I'm saying you DON'T have to be some sort of a referee everytime you have to comment on the things that you don't AGREE!

Enjoy life! Life is short. Choose you battle in other words. If you have to be referee or you want ot bash or scold somebody you don't agree with.

Might as well resign from work coz you would not have enough time to reply to them all! Just kidding! But I hope you get my point!

 

Not my point. You reply to NONE of them. Regardless of the reason you don't, it's a hypocritical stance. You don't seem to mind refereeing fans you DON'T agree with. You take the time to make statements to them. It is what it is.

So while you may not feel the need to point out the same flaws in Pacfans that you do in others, it doesn't change the fact that you're doing it and what it means. You aren't being unbiased. So don't pretend you are.

 

Depends on how it's being said. If the fan writes JMM by KO or UD with out further explanation to the last detail its ok.

what I don't like is a for somebody to write a litany on how JMM will beat pac and when I asked him to put whatever he wrote in practice is he disappears and tell you this and that?! You get my point! Where's his balls? Get my point!

IT's a simple as this

A chain smoker preacher is telling his flock to stop smoking..because of the ffw reasons...then the preacher says all the bad effects, and even brings out some video to prove what he is saying is correct and accurate..the preacher has been studying the effects of smoking since he was still in school and really talks about the topic confidently...

So professor why don't you stop smoking yourself! asked the student!

You see, if I STOP smoking I will miss you guys, I can't preach anymore.. coz I will not be able to concentrate on my preaching......
the list goes on...

PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH! simple. dont make it justfiable or complicated!

 

You are asking people to prove opinions, ones that can't be proved or disproved. I already had this discussion with you.

 

assasin.. just admit. you got owned by pacdbest :yep :yep :yep :yep :yep :yep :yep
dont be jealous of his pin point accuracy in predicting donaire-vic.



and yes, arguello is not god. he is a quiter. move on. unless pac is a cabby driver from tijuana, then ill believe you. :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
i just hate ******s like you making quiters win in every mtyhtical match
up

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

 

PacD didn't own anyone with that prediction. If he did, does that mean he was "owned" when he got Guzman-Soto wrong? And for the specific reasons I told him he would get it wrong?

What does Arguello quiting have to do with a fantasy matchup. Does that quit somehow make all the other times he won NOT count? Does Pacquiao getting stopped mean that he is weak to the body in every fight he is in from that point on? Or was it only relevant to that fight or a fight that is similar?

 

Alright lets stop with the damn emoticons.

 

I'm not saying I'm NOT biased. What I'm saying is I DON'T feel the need to reply if they are pacfans. They are no my side. Now, if somebody starts bashing my boxer then I feel the urgent to reply.

If a fan feels PAC can BEAT Hatton so be it. I may OR may not agree with it but I respect their OPINION on that matter!

What's your problem with that!?

Now, if somebody wants to fight pac with PBF or oscar dela hoya so be it! they may say pac can ko them out! So be it! Like I said I may or may not agree with it.

Bottom LINE, IT NEVER HAPPENED. It's somebody imagination. YOu can't correct somebody imagination! coz it's not defenite as in 1+1=2.

Now, if a pac fan says something which is not accurate such as pac vs morales is 3-0. THIS is NOT A FACT! then I will feel the obligation to correct them.

Get the difference!? IF it's not factual then if I read it I will reply. If it's based on OPINION (never happened yet!) then EXPECT MY REPLY