Pacquiao vs Hatton 140 who wins?

So. Like I said, just as you point out when JMM fans do it, and ignore Pacfans doing it, I am pointing out that you do this. Seems a bit biased to me. But that's my call.

 

Its simple yOU are happy with opinion so be it! but what I like is testing
what you believe it! Like I said, OPINION is ALL TALK! What I like is to TEST what EVER you are saying or believing.

Believing is the higher form of OPINION. For some people they could only take up to OPINION. Sorry I over estimated some people here!

 

Really? Point out to me where I said that or implied it. Otherwise you're a liar.

As I recall, I simply said that you cannot decide for others what the definition of "practice what you preach" is or how they may be employed in such practice.

 

:huh:huh:huh:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl This will wake my co workers up with laughter in the morning.

 

You ever notice that when someone types your name, it looks funny in the post?

 

:yep I do love seeing it though. Im an ego maniac you know

 

So you want to to scold them for putting funny pictures? so reprimand them for saying such things?! so you want me to police the pacfans? :huh

THIS forum are for boxing fans! REMEMEBER!? If you are the unbiased fan as you claim to be how come I never (IF i recall it correctly) I never heard you say anything about this infamous boxing fan called BLACK?!

You are biased yourself coz you are only "policing" if there is such a word the pacfans...

 

**** your moms head, too?

 

Silvermags, your 38 and yet you still whine and complain like a double standard toting problem child? Seriously dude, what gives?

 

WTF?:rofl:rofl My Puma sense is tingling!:smoke

 

I never said what I wanted you to do. Fact of the matter is, pick on either both sides for being idiots or neither side IMO. Not just one side. That's my deal.

Perhaps you should ask Psychopath if I ever said anything to Black during his argument with him, or pointed out to Black that it makes no logical sense that there was a clause in the contract for JMM. Because I did.

Yes, it's a forum for boxing fans, logical and illogical. I am entitled to point out flaws in arguments just as you are allowed to only argue with fans who are against Pacquiao. I don't see your argument here, as I am doing the same thing you are doing....just against you.

I argue with anyone who makes biased unfounded remarks. Against or for Pacquiao, and anyone else.

 

is that what it means?

 

If that's your opinion so be it! Nothing to argue about it! In fact I don't have to argue on all that is being said.

Thanks for the comment re issue about black! How about the comments that JMM fans was robbed 3x's. Did you reply? or are you the one who said you can't comment coz you did not see the other fights?

Sorry the above question is of topic.

I already said my piece and Stick to it! Now do or write what you want to write. i'm no police! :yep

 

Your comments are irrelevant! BUy yourself somebody to talk too! However it's nice to see you are counting my thread.

MAN! you are bored to death aren't you? Have not any man counting my thread!

Here's the deal. Count each of pacfans thread vs the thread of JMM fans and give us the count EVERY MONTH! It will keep you BUSY!!!!

I wonder how many boxing fans are like there like EL PUMA?
a) joining the thread with irrelevent reply
b) counting somebody's thread

El Puma, you indeed a rare breathing something....:rofl

 

Yes you are.....you police those who say things about Pacquiao that you don't like or argue against him in some way...am I wrong? Isn't that what you were doing in the Pacquiao vs Pep thread? Pointing out how one side was wrong in proclaiming so profusely that Pep would win, when in fact the fight had never taken place and they couldn't prove it?

And my answer in the JMM robbed 3x thread, I said he was robbed against John. I haven't seen the other fights.