Pacquiao VS Hearns: Among the goofiest Pac fantasy match Articles I've seen -You?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxed Ears, Mar 23, 2010.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    Perhaps people are abusing you because you're so unclear in your meaning that they take away all kinds of intentions from seemingly ambiguous statements. Is English your first language?
     
  2. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Thanks for ignoring most of my points *******. This is why nobody takes you ******s seriously. You dont know **** about boxing. :roll:

    Does Pacquiao have a weak chin because he got KTFOut by some journeymen in the phillipines.

    Tell me clown, how did Hearns handle Durans power?
     
  3. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009
    My answer to your question if Pac can generate Hagler or Leonard power at 147: it's debatable and subjective. In other words, you don't have the right to conclude Pac can't KO fighters the way Hagler and Leonard (i.e. to Hearns) did at 147.

    All i can say is, I wouldn''t blame people that will say Pac can KO like Leonard and Hagler at 147. Especially after watching Hatton going down like a dozen times in 2 rounds and Cotto KO'd twice.
     
  4. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Pacquiao couldnt penetrate Clottey's guard. Hearns and Hagler would have broke his arms then ko'd him. leonard would have spinning in circles.

    Hearns would have KO'd Hatton within the first 15 seconds, he would have KO'd Cotto in 4 at worst.

    Pacquiao is the hardest P4P today, but he couldnt generate the power that Hearns could because of Hearns' height, reach and build.
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    Of course it's debatable...but there's nothing really existing to support one side of the debate. So it's really just debatable in the sense that most possible things are debatable no matter what the odds are. Hagler was a middleweight, by the way. Hatton went down three times, not a like a dozen and he wasn't a welterweight either. Cotto was knocked down twice. Not out.
     
  6. GSP

    GSP Member Full Member

    227
    0
    Jan 2, 2010
    where has all the *******s like boom boom and blade runner gone? there bound to say props to the article writed for recognising mannys power lol
     
  7. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    The sad thing is, this doesnt suprise me one bit & we will continue to be fed this delusional nonsense until Roach n co stop protecting their money train & allow him to take his ass spanking from Mayweather (or Mosely, should he pull off the win may 1st)
     
  8. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009
    You mean there's not much to support Leonard and Hagler having better power because their KO percentage compare to Pac at welterweight and above isn't above 66% (2 out 3 WW fights won via KO)?
     
  9. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    If Pac defeats Mayweather and Mosley and Paul Williams, all without suffering extreme injury, I will entertain the thought of him going eight with Hearns. Will you? Because I think that's fair.
     
  10. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    If you're that simplistic, we don't even need to continue a discussion. :good

    When Pacquiao does this to a solid welterweight at 147, we can talk though.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_4IfSckVsw[/ame]
     
  11. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009

    If this is how you rate Hearns. I reckon if i ask you in the 80's how far will Hagler or Leonard go the distance against Hearns - i bet your answer will be Hearns via KO in 10.


    Oh wait, those fights already happened. Hearns didn't do well as you rate him to be.
     
  12. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    What you just said had no logical pattern at all. It literally was senseless.
     
  13. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009
    I admit im a bit overshooting on that post. That's not how i usually see things, im more subjective than that. But the way you overrate Hearns and how you put down critics (and fans) that's fond of Pac by your insults - is blatant.
     
  14. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    He had a weak midsection at age 17, the same age Hearns was in that amateur video. Hearns never gave that fat slow version of Duran a chance to open up. LMFAO if you think that version of Duran is anything like today's version of Pac. Pac took Cotto's and Clottey's best shots to the head and what? Nothng! NOTHING! Not a flinch. Is Hearn's punch suppossed to be like 3 times stronger than Cotto or Clottey at that weight? Tell me genius, how does Hearns hurt this version of Pac when no damn welterweight today can even make him flinch?

    Of course, you were probably one of the fools that thought Pac would get his head taken off if he fought at welterweight. Surprise, surprise....
     
  15. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    Is it? I don't put anyone down personally for liking Pacquiao in and of itself. I didn't put down the author of that article personally. I didn't put down Pacquiao personally and called him a great, great fighter, did I not? There is nothing about anything I've said here that is biased for Hearns or against Pacquiao. At all. I said Hearns chin issues were overrated...does that mean I'm a gigantic Hearns fan with a bunch of bias? Or is that something you're perceiving defensively?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.