Pacquiao vs joan guzman

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrjotatp4p, Oct 7, 2010.


  1. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
  2. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Pacquiao would be too much for him.
     
  3. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Guzman, with his movement and speed will puzzle Pac for the 1st 2 rounds. He may even land some bombs on pac but Pac can absorb it no problem.

    After that and due to Pac's constant pressue, Guzman slows down and starts getting hit often.

    Around 6th Guzman gets hit almost at will by Pac especially when he gets backed up the ropes.

    Guzman gets knocked down repeatedly in the 7th and the ref saw enough.:nono
     
  4. Tora

    Tora Guest

    guzmans lack of discipline decides this fight, imo he would loss before he even gets to the ring
     
  5. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Pacquiao: Because Guzman is over the hill. (Best days are gone)
     
  6. kartog

    kartog Agent Smith Full Member

    3,975
    84
    Sep 8, 2006
    Guzman does not even deserve a thread on any boxing forum.

    The guy won his last few fights simply by shamelessly outweighing the other guy at the weigh-in by two weight classes.
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Guzman at 122-135, Pacquaio at 147
     
  8. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    Now...Pac wins by decision, a rather wide decision pulling away late. Not because Pacquiao is so much better than Guzman, but Guzaman doesn't appear to have the same focus he once did. But 3-5 years ago...Pacquiao gets out boxed....EASILY.
     
  9. rulb

    rulb â—„bannedâ–º Full Member

    688
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    agree:good

    Pac is too much for guzman now.
     
  10. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010
    You honestly think Roach would let Manny fight a boxer as cagey and skilled as Guzman?

    To put it bluntly, Pacquiao's comeback since Marquez exposed him is taking on six consecutive brawlers, who just come to fight.

    Styles make fights in boxing. Diaz, Hatton, Oscar, Margarito, Cotto are just made for Pacquiao. They got the fights because of the way they fight.

    Pacquiao's turned down probably 3 million PPVs, and $40 million in the bank in not facing Marquez and Mosely when he had the chance.

    And it aint because they're easy wins.

    Watch the Clottey fight again. Manny can barely land a shot when the person he's fighting aint wide open.

    Roach will keep lining up the brawlers, and Manny will keep knocking them down.

    Don't try and claim he's the same fighter with pure boxers
     
  11. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Pac is the same fighter with pure boxers.
     
  12. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    377
    Feb 10, 2009
    I really wanted to see this fight at 130, where I would actually make Guzman the favourite. Now, Pac starts beating him up after the first few rounds and stops him.

    I actually think now would be the perfect tim for Pac to fight him though. Guzman is probably the only world-class fighter around these weight classes who (at least tries to) fight like Mayweather. Pac would get invaluable experiance against a slick fighter who uses the shoulder roll but who doesn't have much chance of beating him.
     
  13. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers Kimbo #1 P4P Full Member

    7,057
    5
    Sep 16, 2010

    Yes, but only because Guzman would come in at 147 if they fought at 122-135.
     
  14. Whoelsebutjames

    Whoelsebutjames Member Full Member

    256
    1
    May 14, 2010
    Joan got the skills but he aint dedicated enough to play pac mans game
     
  15. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    LOL agreed!