Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez Round By Round!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kg0208, Mar 15, 2008.


  1. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    not dollars. 3rd world currency. feel pretty bad still, this ruins a perfectly good birthday week
     
  2. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Not moving backwards...lol getting pushed back and he missed a whole lot of right hand counters that they were giving JMM credit for. JMM was hitting on the ****ing hip with his left hook blatently. I guess you dingbats did not catch that all fight long. That left hook was landing on the waist line aimed at the hip. Thats why it hurt pac.
     
  3. Pugalist

    Pugalist Member Full Member

    204
    0
    Oct 9, 2004
    Based on their two fights, you cannot make this claim. Marquz is the better techician and Manny the stronger, bigger puncher. They'v gone even up for two fights with Marquez winning most of the rounds and Pac staying even via his power (aka knockdowns).
     
  4. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    As the best in boxing.....

    You obviously dont know **** about this sport (or whom your arguing with for that matter...) so let me school you.

    Corrales
    Castillo
    Castillo
    Manfredy
    Augustus
    Chavez
    Corely
    Gatti
    Judah
    Oscar
    Baldo
    Hatton

    5 division world title holder....undefeated...#1 p4p in just about EVERY FREAKING LIST YOU READ...

    And he hasnt fought anyone....delete your screenname dude.

    Marquez is a damn good fighter (hell I had him winning a close one here...but wont argue the outcome because it was that close..), but he hasnt fought the comp Floyd has.

    And BTW, these guys on here will tell ya...I CANT STAND FLOYD MAYWEATHER...but I can respect that he is the top guy out there.

    Again, do some research on the sport before arguing something as ridiculous as this....
     
  5. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    And I guess you missed the beginning staredown, where the ref CLEARLY stated that the trunks were high and the waistline would be allowed.

    :-(
     
  6. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    :good

    Thanks bro!!!
     
  7. bulakenyo

    bulakenyo Am I a boxing fan yet? Full Member

    8,356
    20
    Jun 2, 2006
    Thank you for the round by round updates, guys.

    Thanks a lot.

    Good job, guys.
     
  8. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    I have ****ing eyes of my own. Pacs trunks were not high..lol they never are. JMM were....I would have to look at the replay and see what the ref said EXACTLY. But pacs trunks were not high. JMM was hooking low on the HIP..illegal punch usual done on the blind side of the ref.
     
  9. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    He said punches on the waistline for BOTH fighters were to be allowed. Regardless of how high or low YOU feel the trunks were, it doesnt matter...they were allowed and it was stated early. Ya cant cry foul on that afterwards.

    Again tho, it was a close fight with quite a few close rounds...to say that we gave them all to JMM for no reason is an outright LIE and I would LOVE to see a quote of either myself of kg doing that. By stating that exactly how you saw it was the way it is, no arguement sounds a hell of alot more bias than what either of us posted.

    But more importantly, ya see the guy saying Pac and JMM were the two best fighters in boxing, then saying Floyd hasnt fought anyone???

    :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  10. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    Sorry but I actually am a boxer. How about you?
    Secondly, I also owned you when you had Simms beating Alcine.
    Thirdly, Pac has beat three legends. Floyd hasnt beat any but an old oscar. Its all about competition and everybody but the sheeple knows Floyd is a cherry picker whos bad for boxing.
     
  11. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006

    I say robbery.
     
  12. Carlos J

    Carlos J Arse Full Member

    190
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    I'll give you robbery as a Brit, but I'll take a wrong 'un.

    SD to Pacman, you're having a laugh?
     
  13. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Maracho is my boy on all topics except boxing....:lol::lol::lol::lol: Plus I am drunk as ****. JMM is a great fighter. Pac is a young exciting fighter. You KNOW he is getting the nod in a close one. I love watching Pac fight. I dont know why..lol....I am being biased ha ha I admit it. I scored a few rounds even that JMM edged out...ha ha. Im drunk so I dont care....Maracho is a lunatic when it comes to boxing though.
     
  14. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    I was going to answer this...but god your dumb...if you really are a boxer, I think you may have taken a few too many shots to the head.

    Seriously, learn something about the sport...
     
  15. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    I do have a very strong bias agaisnt Oscar and Floyd but I am pretty sure I am right about both.