I have their series tied at 2-2, personally I think Pac won the 1st and the 2nd, JMM won the 3rd and the 4th (and will win the rest, imo).
1- Pac by 1 point 2- Pac won close but clear 3- JMM won close but clear IMO 4- Pac was busting up Juan, I had it 4 rounds to 2 (before ktfo6)
:good Im not saying this in a condescending way, but just as a suggestion (by all means you can tell me to go to hell ) In boxing there will always be variance in the way fights are viewed, depending on who does the viewing. I think that is something most boxing fans with a brain have accepted. However, at the same time there is a 'mean' (in the mathematical sense) somewhat, of fights, and a 'range', that when someones view of what was happening, and score of it, are so far off the radar, that its no longer excusable by the 'its subjective' route. Just imo What Im saying is that to score the third fight for Pac is something that seems so off the mark that it will catch a lot of heat, and its not that you should care what others think so much, but that you should wonder if you are viewing whats happening in the ring accurately. But I feel like Im sounding like an arrogant, condescending *****, so Im going to stop. I don't mean it like that at all... Im just saying from one boxing fan to another, that scoring the third fight for Pac seems amazingly 'off'.
1st fight - scored it for PAC 2nd fight- scored it for Marquez 3rd fight - scored it a DRAW 4th Fight - Manny took a nap .