Who won this fight? I scored it 116-112, and 115-113 for Marquez, he landed the way more effective shots, and he just seemed to dominate the pace of this fight.
Razor thin decision for Pacquiao (like Maidana over Mayweather). Or Draw (like Mayweather-Maidana I).
LOL!!!!!!!! You're saying Marquez/Pacquiao was as close as Mayweather/Maidana? Why did Roach say that Mayweather won every round after the 4th? Hmm? Is your hero's trainer wrong?
I had the 3rd fight a draw. 1: 113-112 Pac 2: 114-113 JMM 3: 114-114 DRAW 4: JMM TTFO Pac For me, JMM has the series, and even if he didn't have the series, he put the exclamation point on the series by being the only one to win a match DECISEVELY! Head-to-head, JMM > Pac because of that. But at the end of the day, Floyd and Pac are two gigantic ******s! :smoke
What the fook does Roach's opinion have to do w/ mine? Roach also said that he fell asleep watching both fights. I thought the first one was immensely entertaining and the second one embarrassing (for Floyd since he had a paid off ref and ran most of the time).
IV (and III if anyone scored it for JMM) should have a gigantic * next to it, especially in light of JMM showing up to the Avacado fight w/ massive boils and a sh!t ton of pimples on his chest and back (clear sign of long term doping).
I did, and I stand by every scorecard I had in the series. Even if you DIDN'T agree with me that JMM leads 2-1-1, JMM obviously won the series with KTFO6. No debate. None, to the contrary. :smoke
This content is protected is the reason why all these guys say that they want to prove that they are the best and ALWAYS name drop Pacquiao and Floyd, but rarely JMM. It's always this guy and that guy wants to prove that they are right up there with Pacquiao and Floyd. It's because the entire boxing world knows that JMM was juiced up to his eyebawls for III and IV.
Then what's Pac's excuse for refusing extra testing, which automatically makes him look suspicious? Pac is just as big a f@g as Floyd in all of this, make no mistake. The only thing that arguably makes Floyd a bit of an extra f@g is the fact that he IS the A-side. But I wish horrible fates upon Pac and Floyd's careers and long term financial stability. 2 *****s, plain and simple. :smoke
Well, to begin, Pacquiao never declined extra testing. Please get this right. The impasse was over the cut off date of 24 days. Of those 24 days, 7 were going to be devoted to Fight Week (travel, staying limber, media/promotional obligations). There's no miracle PED that Pac (or Floyd) could have benefited from in that small window! Also, there would have been unlimited urine. This not-so-minor detail aside, Pacquiao had already given up top billing to Floyd (Floyd's name first on all promotions, 2nd onto the scale, 2nd into the ring)... in a game that's 99% mental and ego, Pacquiao took a stance when Floyd tried to muscle him around even further. :good
I did no such thing. Those 2 have, for years. They don't give a fuk about any of us. One would rather cheat on his wife making as much money as he can, and the other would rather beat his baby Momma while making as much as he can. Neither would have amounted to anything noteworthy in the 80s. :smoke
Boxing is not a game. Roach is on record saying that it's their fault for the fight not happening in 09. If Floyd and Pac were taking the same random testing why does it even matter?
WTF does that matter? No matter what you claim, Pac created an aura of suspicion by ducking Floyd's stupid demands, making them both look like complete a-holes. Pac & Floyd both suck men off and drink sperm instead of milk. :smoke