Pacquiao vs. Marquez a robbery? On What Basis did Juan Marquez "WIN"???

You know I've never been shitty to you AR,despite these endless suicide-inducing threads.
You seem to feel the need to prove at least twice a day that Marquez is a cheat or didn't win or is a naughty toestepperatsch
I'm trying to discourage you for your own benefit.
Move on and accept what even Freddie Roach knows...
Marquez is your daddy's daddy.

 

:think... Juan Manuel Marquez?
Give it up man,you've become a laughing stock and I was trying to help you.
You're on here day and night posting more and more neurotic threads.
Girlfriends(or boyfriends) are fun.
Outside your bedroom and past the apron strings there's a big wide world where there's more to think about than..."what can I say to convince myself that Marquez didn't beat Pacquaio today?"
You'll thank me for it one day.
You'll pop that cherry and say"Damn G was right! This is fun"
I'm not your enemy.

 

Lmao he thinks compubox is a computer!!!!

 

Marquez won on the basis that you think Pacquiao won, that's good enough for me :good

 

I can't top this AR
You'll be here all night and all day trying to think of a way to prove that Marquez isn't "The man who always had Pacquaio's number"
Unfortunately for you it will be true tomorrow,the next day and so it goes.
I will be able to post without reasonable people(present company aside,naturally) going.."****,him AGAIN!"
You can post and post.
It will never make it so.
Marquez should be 2-0-1 with Manny and the other week was the widest margin of the three fights.
See you tomorrow.
Try and get a sleep.

 

Why don't you Marqueers and *****s read the article and come up with a rebuttal.

How about answering the question of the writer first. :good

 

I'm actually wondering if your a real life Ali G and the irony of your av is totally lost on you.
If you dropped this **** about Marquez you'd be quite a funny guy.
Remember I was one who tried to be nice...gun

 

Dear Axlrose,


**** you...

Sincerely,
Every fan here sick of your ******ed threads.

 

ALL CREDITS GOES TO:

This content is protected

This content is protected

http://www.nowboxing.com/2011/11/pa...rquez-win/21923/comment-page-1/#comment-51682

Thursday, November 24, 2011

By Don Donatello

Many boxers, trainers, and their promoters will employ the crying game after a loss. It’ part of the game. The crying is meant to misdirect the fans into thinking that their fighter did not legitimately lose the fight. Because prize fighting is to attract the paying fans, hence, the name, a boxer must build and maintain his fan base so he can economically gain as a fighter.

The biggest way for a boxer to lose his fan base is by losing a fight. The bigger the defeat, the more of his fan base that will abandon his ship. A close loss on the other hand will hurt his marketability, particularly the casual boxing fan, but he probably will keep most of his fan base. But a loss is still a loss and it will affect the fighter’s marketability, in most cases. So the crying game is employed to assuage the stigma of a loss.

The fight will have to be a close fight for the crying game to have the desired effect. Crying robbery when a fighter clearly lost just makes that fighter look like a fool, in that case, he will likely hurt his fan base even more.

Before the internet, before recorded media, the crying game was very effective. After all, there was no video of the fight to be scrutinized by the public. But today there are video recorders, the Internet, YouTube, and other media outlets to watch the fight in question.

With that, I challenge those who scored the Marquez/Pacquiao 3 fight for Marquez. On what basis did Marquez win that fight on November 12? For those who favor Pacquiao in a win, they have the punch stat numbers to show. CompuBox tally 176 punches landed for Manny Pacquiao and only 138 for Juan Manuel Marquez. It also shows that Pacquiao clearly inflicted more damage on his opponent. All three official judges unanimously agreed that Marquez did not beat Pacquiao.