Pacquiao vs. Marquez at 147

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ElTrigueno, Jan 1, 2011.


  1. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVStmLCoH30[/ame]

    vs


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G84hIFoalnk[/ame]


    and


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-Qkab5817U[/ame]


    and


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfbbUhIH1a4[/ame]



    Don't tell me Pac still looked the same compare to when he fought marquez. Pac is more balanced and now can throw that right hook more effectively.
     
  2. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    :lol:
     
  3. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    Geez, Pac looks like he just came from a war prison compared to how he looks right now.
     
  4. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Check out their relative waist sizes.. pac looks like he could wear a kids size pants.
     
  5. sandy mac

    sandy mac Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    Pac looks good or better because of the type of opponant in front of him. These guys cover up when he throws combinations. marquez throws counters in between and while manny is unloading. This makes a huge difference.
     
  6. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    You also forget to put in the fact that Pac had to drain himself when he fought marquez. Pac's walking weight was 155 when he fought marquez at 130. Pac weighed in at 128 in one of those fights. This makes a huge difference.
     
  7. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010

    Amazing. Anyone who feels Pac MIGHT have trouble with an opponent, he ALWAYS had problems with, is considered a "*****". :huh Is this conversation even about Floyd?

    ******* logic indeed. :-(

    And...I said Pac improved marginally, not DRASTICALLY...as some of you Pac nuthuggers would have us believe. :bart
     
  8. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010

    I see you didn't speak to Pac's level of opposition, in comparison to JMM skill-wise. What you did was deflect and change the subject to whom JMM has faced.
     
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pac will knock Marquez out if they ever fight again.
     
  10. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    420
    Aug 21, 2010
    147 Marquez will be on a stretcher
     
  11. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    Is this conversation about Floyd? Says who?

    You're always pushing the same argument over and over again.

    Now Pacman improved marginally for your convenience? Get off JMM balls.
     
  12. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    I really don't want to see Marquez get seriously injury, but he will if he fights Pac.
     
  13. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    a drained Pac gives Marquez hell.

    anyway, you're not worth my time. carry on stupid:hi:
     
  14. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    You're talking "*****" this and "*****" that. That's the derogatory term you apply to fans of Floyd's talent, right? What does this conversation have to do with Floyd?

    I'm pushing the argument that fits the topic. This is about JMM vs Pac. If you don't like it and can't present a suitable counter argument...don't reply to it.

    I concede that if Pac has improved at all, it is only marginally. How is stating that a "convenience" to me? He is, basically, the same type of fighter, skill-wise he was in 2008, with marginal improvements to skills he had fully acquired by 2008. The change is not DRASTIC. The drastic difference you are seeing is his level of opposition. Pac was not a one handed fighter then. Freddie Roach and many people at that time, feel he was a complete fighter, by then. But, knowing this...YOU will still claim he was one-handed. :roll:

    Wake up.

    I'm not only one that thinks JMM would give Pac problems. Why don't go on over to b0xingtalk and similar websites and you will see many feel this way. Freddie Roach, himself, is quoted as saying Marquez is tough comp. This is after the ever so pivotal ODLH fight, where a "new improved" Manny Pacquiao was born.
     
  15. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    at 140, jmm may still give pac problems style-wise. but i see pac winning nonetheless. see pac-barrera 2 or pac-solis and compare that to pac-hatton. against barrera, he relied too much on the left hand and was swinging wildly, had poor balance and defense.

    at 147, jmm gets koed for sure.