Pacquiao vs Prime Hearns at Welterweight. (No catchweights) Honestly Who wins?

Hearns ko

 

The man is just butthurt. :yep He would KO Floyd easily too.


For the record, on Fight Night, I can KO Manny using Hearns inside 5 :!:. Then again I can also do that to SRR, therefore Hearns is God.

 

atsch All you want to do is wait for Pac fans to pick him, and then flame them.

Hearns obviously.

 

I wouldent go that far.

Maybe from 147 to 160 i agree

But not 168 &175

Andre Ward beats him

Chad dawson beats him

Glen Johnson beats him

Tavoris Cloud Knocks him out

BTW Hearns Destroys Pacman in 5.

 

Pac weighed 144 last fight the guy should still be a light weight. Hearns Ko

 

bumped his own thread, just for this.
some of your co-joyboys will probably kick you out with that logic.

so if pac can not beat a "PRIME" hearns, he's not an all ti...???
fail.

 

How in God's name does Manny at 5'6 (barely) get inside of Tommy's jab?

 

Pryor did beat a younger, weaker, slower Hearns where a more experienced Pryor had his way. Pryor would NOT do to Tommy what he did in the ams. Trust me.

 

At the age of 33 he defeated Virgil Hill at 175! Hill was defending the Title for the tenth time I think.

 

After 3 rounds? Pac is on the floor in a pool of blood and Jherri curl juice. Tommy Hearns is asking for his activator!

 

Most def. You could tell TH muscle mass and coordination had not kicked in.

 

A poll would have been funny!

 

Just let yo Soul Glo!!!!!!!!!!

 

Pryor could not beat the professional Hearns. He beat the young amatuer Hearns when Pryor was 21 and Tommy was 17. Big difference from when Hearns was WBA champion. Tommy would have stopped a Pryor who moved up in weight and stopped him in 3 or 4 rounds.

 

The welterweight who beat Hearns was unique. Ray Leonard could have been the best welterweight in history. He was a hard puncher and quick and could do everything. Manny does not compare to the welterweight Ray Leonard, who is the guy who beat Hearns below 160. The only guy.