PACQUIAO VS. RIOS @ 147 : Who Wins and How (?)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cotto(e), Mar 8, 2012.


  1. anundecidedarm

    anundecidedarm Active Member Full Member

    812
    0
    Oct 23, 2011
    Pac rips him open a new bunghole
     
  2. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    reasonable, plus pac is not what he used to be.

    This is a dangerous fight for Pac.
     
  3. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    :lol: getting excuses ready for a fight that might not even happen
     
  4. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Pacquiao by brutal stoppage. Fun the short time it lasts though.
     
  5. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    The difference in foot-speed is absurd. Rios would be three or four steps behind the entire fight.
     
  6. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    rios is so easy to hit, plus he fights to manny's advantage, straight up. manny tko
     
  7. sg85

    sg85 Bang on the chan Full Member

    2,045
    0
    Dec 24, 2009
    Tailor-made KO victory for Pac.
     
  8. madkillaz692000

    madkillaz692000 Fuerte y Abundante Full Member

    3,492
    0
    May 3, 2009
    Tailor made fight for Pac
     
  9. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    I think by the time that fight comes along Rios will take it. Right now it is obvious Pac takes it. I see Arum feeding Pac to Rios in about 2 years which by then he will have declined some. Rios is not the same fighter as Margarito. People who say that really do not know boxing as well as they think they do. I see Rios as being more skilled but not quite with the same chin as Margarito.

    I will go on to say this. Rios has the most powerful jab in the business. He really would last longer in the sport if he worked behind it more.